Baker v. I.Q. Data International, Inc.
Filing
38
MINUTE ORDER denying 36 Defendants Unopposed Motion to Restrict Exhibit Pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.2, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/30/2014.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00114-WJM-MEH
SCOTT BAKER,
Plaintiff,
v.
I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Washington corporation,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on September 30, 2014.
Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Restrict Exhibit Pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.2 [filed
September 30, 2014; docket #36] is denied. Pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.2B, any motion to
restrict public access to a document or proceeding must, among other showings, “[a]ddress the
interest to be protected and why such interest outweighs the presumption of public access,” and
“[i]dentify a clearly defined and serious injury that would result if access is not restricted[.]”
Defendant has not explained why Plaintiff’s interest in keeping an address and phone number
confidential outweighs the interest of the public in accessing Exhibit A to the motion to dismiss, nor
has Defendant explained how Plaintiff could suffer “identity theft” or “economic harm” from the
publication of Plaintiff’s address and phone numbers, which typically can be accessed via an internet
search or a telephone book.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?