Baker v. I.Q. Data International, Inc.

Filing 38

MINUTE ORDER denying 36 Defendants Unopposed Motion to Restrict Exhibit Pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.2, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/30/2014.(evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-00114-WJM-MEH SCOTT BAKER, Plaintiff, v. I.Q. DATA INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Washington corporation, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on September 30, 2014. Defendant’s Unopposed Motion to Restrict Exhibit Pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.2 [filed September 30, 2014; docket #36] is denied. Pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.2B, any motion to restrict public access to a document or proceeding must, among other showings, “[a]ddress the interest to be protected and why such interest outweighs the presumption of public access,” and “[i]dentify a clearly defined and serious injury that would result if access is not restricted[.]” Defendant has not explained why Plaintiff’s interest in keeping an address and phone number confidential outweighs the interest of the public in accessing Exhibit A to the motion to dismiss, nor has Defendant explained how Plaintiff could suffer “identity theft” or “economic harm” from the publication of Plaintiff’s address and phone numbers, which typically can be accessed via an internet search or a telephone book.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?