Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Berling et al.

Filing 69

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe: Motion Hearing held on 3/3/2015. Taking under advisement 60 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Forthwith Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel the FDIC to Produce One or More Witnesses to Testify Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6). Court Reporter: FTR - E. E. Miller. FTR: Courtroom A502. (emill)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe Civil Action No. 14-cv-00137-CMA-MJW FTR - Courtroom A-502 Date: Courtroom Deputy, Ellen E. Miller March 03, 2015 Counsel Parties FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR UNITED WESTERN BANK, Gregory P. O’Hara Paul H. Schwartz Kathleen M. Balderston Plaintiff(s), v. Phillip A. Parrott Jeffrey D. Bailey CHARLES J. BERLING, JAMES H. BULLOCK, ANTHONY C. CODORI, BERNARD C. DARRÉ, GARY G. PETAK, WILLIAM D. SNIDER, CINDY J. STERETT, JOHN S. UMBAUGH, and SCOT T. WETZEL, Defendant(s). COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER HEARING: MOTION HEARING Court in Session: 11:27 a.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. The Court raises Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Forthwith Hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel the FDIC to Produce One or More Witnesses to Testify Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) for oral argument. Argument by Mr. O’Hara on behalf of Plaintiff. Argument by Mr. Bailey on behalf of Defendants. It is ORDERED: Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Forthwith Hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Compel the FDIC to Produce One or More Witnesses to Testify Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) [Docket No. 60, filed February 13, 2015] is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. The court will issue its written Order. HEARING CONCLUDES. Court in recess: 11:56 a.m. To order a transcript of this proceedings, contact Avery Woods Reporting Total In-Court Time: 00:29 (303) 825-6119 or Toll Free 1-800-962-3345.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?