Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Berling et al.
Filing
69
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe: Motion Hearing held on 3/3/2015. Taking under advisement 60 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Forthwith Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Compel the FDIC to Produce One or More Witnesses to Testify Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6). Court Reporter: FTR - E. E. Miller. FTR: Courtroom A502. (emill)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00137-CMA-MJW
FTR - Courtroom A-502
Date:
Courtroom Deputy, Ellen E. Miller
March 03, 2015
Counsel
Parties
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
AS RECEIVER FOR UNITED WESTERN BANK,
Gregory P. O’Hara
Paul H. Schwartz
Kathleen M. Balderston
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Phillip A. Parrott
Jeffrey D. Bailey
CHARLES J. BERLING,
JAMES H. BULLOCK,
ANTHONY C. CODORI,
BERNARD C. DARRÉ,
GARY G. PETAK,
WILLIAM D. SNIDER,
CINDY J. STERETT,
JOHN S. UMBAUGH, and
SCOT T. WETZEL,
Defendant(s).
COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER
HEARING:
MOTION HEARING
Court in Session:
11:27 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
The Court raises Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Forthwith Hearing on Defendants’ Motion
to Compel the FDIC to Produce One or More Witnesses to Testify Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6)
for oral argument.
Argument by Mr. O’Hara on behalf of Plaintiff.
Argument by Mr. Bailey on behalf of Defendants.
It is ORDERED:
Defendants’ Unopposed Motion for Forthwith Hearing on Defendants’
Motion to Compel the FDIC to Produce One or More Witnesses to Testify
Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) [Docket No. 60, filed February 13, 2015]
is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. The court will issue its written Order.
HEARING CONCLUDES.
Court in recess: 11:56 a.m.
To order a transcript of this proceedings, contact Avery Woods Reporting
Total In-Court Time: 00:29
(303) 825-6119 or
Toll Free
1-800-962-3345.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?