Lieblein v. Ersek et al

Filing 33

MINUTE ORDER granting 30 Unopposed Motion to Vacate the May 22, 2014 Scheduling/Planning Conference and Associated Deadlines by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 5/2/14.(dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-00144-MSK-KLM STANLEY LIEBLEIN, derivatively on behalf of The Western Union Company, and MARTA/ATU LOCAL 732 EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT PLAN, Plaintiffs, v. HIKMET ERSEK, SCOTT T. SCHEIRMAN, JACK M. GREENBERG, DINYAR S. DEVITRE, RICHARD A. GOODMAN, BETSY D. HOLDEN, LINDA FAYNE LEVINSON, ROBERT G. MENDOZA, MICHAEL A. MILES, JR., WULF VON SCHIMMELMANN, SOLOMON D. TRUJILLO, and THE WESTERN UNION COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Unopposed Motion to Vacate the May 22, 2014 Scheduling/Planning Conference and Associated Deadlines [#30] (the “Motion”). On March 4, 2014, Plaintiffs filed the Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Cases [#15], which seeks consolidation of this case with five other pending lawsuits in this District. They also filed a Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel [#18]. The Court granted Defendants an extension of the deadline to file an answer or other response until 21 days after resolution of the Motion for Appointment of Lead Plaintiff and Lead Counsel [#18], which has not yet occurred. Based on the current posture of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#30] is GRANTED. The Scheduling Conference set for May 22, 2014 at 11:00 a.m. and all associated deadlines are VACATED and will be reset, if necessary, at a later date. Dated: May 2, 2014 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?