Alexander et al v. Liberty Acquisitions Servicing, LLC

Filing 37

ORDER re hearing on 36 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, It is ORDERED the plaintiffs 22 motion for summary judgment is denied, the defendants 21 motion for summary judgment is granted and judgment shall enter for the defendant dismissing this civil action and awarding costs, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/25/2015. (evana, )

Download PDF
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 14-cv-00150-RPM SEAN ALEXANDER and CINDY ALEXANDER, Plaintiffs, v. LIBERTY ACQUISITIONS SERVICING, LLC, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT _____________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to the hearing held today and the oral recitation of undisputed facts and the finding and conclusion that the writ of garnishment issued while a default judgment “remained standing” as a result of County Court Judge Walter’s ruling on April 13, 2012, that service was defective but the defendant failed to provide a legal defense to the plaintiff’s claims. The plaintiffs’ contention is that counsel for the defendant should have recognized that order in error and should have refrained from proceeding with collection efforts because counsel should have known the judgment was void. There is no violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. It is therefore ORDERED the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is denied, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted and judgment shall enter for the defendant dismissing this civil action and awarding costs. Dated: March 25th, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?