Jordan v. Sloan

Filing 37

ORDER adopting and approving 36 Report and Recommendations. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/14/2014.(tscha, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn

Civil Action No. 14-cv-00185-REB-MJW

AARON IVAN JORDAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHRISTOPHER SLOAN, Aurora P.O.,
Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Blackburn, J.
The matter before me is the magistrate judge’s Report & Recommendation on
Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss for Failure To Prosecute (Docket No. 31) and
Order To Show Cause (Docket No. 34) [#36],1 filed October 14, 2014. No objection
having been filed to the recommendation, I review it for plain error only. See MoralesFernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir.
2005).2
1

“[#36]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
2

This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. MoralesFernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122. In addition, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I have construed his
pleadings more liberally and held them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by
lawyers. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007);
Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th
Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972)).

I perceive no error, much less plain error, in the magistrate judge’s
recommended disposition of this matter. The magistrate judge’s thorough recitation of
the procedural history of this case, as well as the history of plaintiff’s other aborted or
abandoned litigation efforts in this district, leads me to concur with the conclusion that a
dismissal with prejudice is appropriate under the factors enumerated in Ehrenhaus v.
Reynolds, 965 F.2d 916, 920 (10th Cir. 1992). I therefore find and conclude that the
magistrate judge’s recommendation should be approved and adopted.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the magistrate judge’s Report & Recommendation on Defendant’s
Motion To Dismiss for Failure To Prosecute (Docket No. 31) and Order To Show
Cause (Docket No. 34) [#36], filed October 14, 2014, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED
as an order of this court;
2. That the Order To Show Cause [#34], filed September 25, 2014, is MADE
ABSOLUTE;
3. That plaintiff’s claims in this lawsuit are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for
failure to prosecute;
4. That judgment with prejudice SHALL ENTER on behalf of defendant,
Christopher Sloan, Aurora P.O., against plaintiff, Aaron Ivan Jordan, on all claims for
relief and causes of action asserted against the defendant in this action; and

2

5. That defendant is AWARDED his costs, to be taxed by the clerk of the court
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.
Dated November 14, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

3