Mullen et al v. Portercare Adventist Healthcare System et al
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/9/14. (bsimm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.: 14-cv-00203-CMA-BNB
DEBBIE JOHNSON, and
COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION,
a Colorado non-profit organization,
PORTERCARE ADVENTIST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM d/b/a CENTURA HEALTH –
PORTER ADVENTIST HOSPITAL, a Colorado non-profit Corporation,
B.S.M.C. Limited Liability Company, d/b/a BROOKSIDE INN, a Colorado Limited Liability
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
The parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree to the following
Stipulated Protective Order and request that it be entered as an Order of the Court.
Upon a showing of good cause in support of the entry of a protective order to protect the
disclosure and discovery of confidential information in this case, IT IS ORDERED:
This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, materials, and information,
including without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories, responses to
requests for admission, deposition testimony, and other information disclosed pursuant to the
disclosure or discovery duties created by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
As used in this Protective Order, “document” is defined as provided in Fed. R.
Civ. P. 34(a). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this
Information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” may be information in which a party
has a statutory, regulatory, or common law right of privacy or protection against dissemination
or disclosure, specifically including but not limited to medical information, passenger
information, as well as personnel information. Nothing in this order is intended to waive any
argument that information designated as confidential, including but not limited to medical or
records of disability, is not confidential information nor prevent a party from taking a position or
advancing an argument that confidentiality of any record has been waived by placing that
information into issue by claims or defenses raised in this case.
CONFIDENTIAL documents, materials, and/or information (collectively
“CONFIDENTIAL information”) shall not, without the consent of the party producing it or
further Order of the Court, be disclosed except that such information may be disclosed to:
attorneys actively working on this case;
persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys actively working on
the case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in the preparation for trial,
at trial, or at other proceedings in this case;
the parties, including designated representatives including insurance and/or selfinsurance representatives for the entity parties or parties sued in their official
expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this proceeding, to
the extent such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial or other proceedings
in this case;
the Court and its employees (“Court Personnel”);
stenographic reporters who are engaged in proceedings necessarily incident to the
conduct of this action;
deponents and witnesses who have been disclosed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26;
other persons by written agreement of the parties.
Prior to disclosing any CONFIDENTIAL information to any person listed above
(other than counsel, persons employed by counsel, Court Personnel and stenographic reporters),
counsel shall provide such person with a copy of this Protective Order and obtain from such
person a written acknowledgment stating that he or she has read this Protective Order and agrees
to be bound by its provisions. All such acknowledgments shall be retained by counsel and shall
be subject to in camera review by the Court if good cause for review is demonstrated by
Documents are designated as CONFIDENTIAL by placing or affixing on them
(in a manner that will not interfere with their legibility) the following or other appropriate notice:
Producing or receiving materials or otherwise complying with the terms of this
Protective Order shall not:
operate as an admission by any party that any particular discovery material
contains or reflects any CONFIDENTIAL information;
prejudice in any way the rights of any party to object to the production of
documents it considers not subject to discovery or otherwise protected from or limited in
discovery on the basis of privilege or otherwise;
prejudice in any way the rights of a party to seek a determination by the Court
regarding whether particular discovery materials should be produced; or
prejudice in any way the rights of a party to apply to the Court for any additional
protection with respect to the confidentiality of information as that party may consider
Counsel for the party producing any information that will be designated
CONFIDENTIAL shall review the information and, prior to designating such information
CONFIDENTIAL, shall certify that the designation as CONFIDENTIAL is based on a good
faith belief that the information is in fact confidential or otherwise entitled to protection.
Whenever a deposition involves the disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL information,
the deposition or portions thereof shall be designated as CONFIDENTIAL and shall be subject
to the provisions of this Protective Order. Such designation shall be made on the record during
the deposition whenever possible, but a party may designate portions of depositions as
CONFIDENTIAL after transcription, provided written notice of the designation is promptly
given to all counsel of record within thirty (30) days after notice by the court reporter of the
completion of the transcript.
A party may object to the designation or lack of designation of particular
CONFIDENTIAL information by giving written notice within thirty (30) days of the designation
of confidentiality or service of documents lacking such designation or as to depositions within
thirty (30) days of service of the transcript of the deposition to the party designating the disputed
information. The written notice shall identify the information to which the objection is made. If
the parties cannot resolve the objection within twenty (20) days after the time the notice is
received, it shall be the obligation of the party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL
to file an appropriate motion requesting that the Court determine whether the disputed
information should be subject to the terms of this Protective Order. If such a motion is timely
filed, the disputed information shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this
Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion. If the designating party fails to file such a
motion within the prescribed time, the disputed information shall lose its designation as
CONFIDENTIAL and shall not thereafter be treated as CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with
this Protective Order. In connection with a motion filed under this provision, the party
designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL shall bear the burden of establishing that good
cause exists for the disputed information to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL.
Any request to restrict access must comply with the requirements of
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2. Any party who intends to use CONFIDENTIAL information in Court
proceedings or in Court filings shall file the CONFIDENTIAL information under seal.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the party asserting that the information is CONFIDENTIAL shall
bear the burden of filing any necessary motion to restrict pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2.
At the conclusion of this case, unless other arrangements are agreed upon, each
document and all copies thereof which have been designated as CONFIDENTIAL shall retain
their designation of confidentiality. This Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any
time for good cause shown following notice to all parties and an opportunity for them to be
Dated April 9, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?