Gaines v. Colvin

Filing 12

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 8/21/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 9/22/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 10/7/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 07/22/2014. (athom, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-0212-AP
DERRICK GAINES,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Joseph A. Whitcomb
Rocky Mountain Disability Law Group

For Defendant:

John F. Walsh, U.S. Attorney
J. Benedict Garcia, Assistant U.S. Attorney
M. Thayne Warner, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 5/16/2014

C.

4.

Date Complaint Was Filed:

1/27/2014

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed:

7/2/2014

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

-1-

The administrative record has been filed. The parties believe the record is complete.
5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate filing any additional evidence.
6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES

The parties do not believe that this case raises any unusual claims.
7.

OTHER MATTERS

This case is not on remand from a judicial decision.
8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.

Thursday, August 21, 2014

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due:

Monday, September 22, 2014

C.
9.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due:

Tuesday, October 7, 2014

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.

10.

Plaintiff's Statement:
Defendant's Statement:

Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant does not request oral argument.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.

All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

B.

11.

( )

(x)

All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A
COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S
CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

-2-

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon
a showing of good cause.
DATED this 22nd day of _July, 2014.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:

John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict Garcia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Colorado

/s/ Joseph A. Whitcomb
Joseph A. Whitcomb
Rocky Mountain Disability Law Group
1391 Speer Blvd., Suite 305
Denver, CO 80204
[phone]
[e-mail]

/s/ M. Thayne Warner
By: M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80249-4003
[phone]
[e-mail]

Attorney for Plaintiff

Attorneys for Defendant

-3-