Williams v. Martinez, et al
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/28/2014. (skl)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00213-BNB
DAVON WILLIAMS,
Petitioner,
v.
[NO DEFENDANT NAMED],
Defendant.
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES
Davon Williams, who is detained in the Denver County Jail, initiated this action on
January 24, 2014, by submitting a Letter to the Court requesting legal advice on
whether the City and County of Denver can lawfully detain him pending an investigation,
without filing formal criminal charges. Mr. Williams is reminded that this Court cannot
provide legal advice to pro se litigants. It is unclear at this time whether Mr. Williams is
asserting a formal pre-trial challenge to his custody in the Denver County Jail.
“The essence of habeas corpus is an attack by a person in custody upon the
legality of that custody, and . . . the traditional function of the writ is to secure release
from illegal custody.” See Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973). “Petitions
under § 2241 are used to attack the execution of a sentence, see Bradshaw v. Story, 86
F.3d 164, 166 (10th Cir.1996), including the lawfulness of pre-trial custody. See
Yellowbear v. Wyoming Atty. General, 525 F.3d 921, 924 (10th Cir. 2008) (citing Wack
v. Edmondson, 472 F.3d 1227, 1235 (10th Cir.2007)).
After pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(a), the court has determined that the
submitted document is deficient as described in this order. Mr. Williams will be directed
to cure the following if he wishes to pursue his claims. Any papers that the Mr. Williams
files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order.
28 U.S.C. § 1915 Motion and Affidavit:
(1)
(2)
(3)
X
X
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
X
is not submitted
is missing affidavit
is missing certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement for the 6-month
period immediately preceding this filing (necessary if filing a habeas
corpus application)
is missing certificate showing current balance in prison account
is missing required financial information
is missing an original signature by the prisoner
is not on proper form (must use the court’s current form):
names in caption do not match names in caption of complaint, petition or
habeas application
other: Mr. Williams may pay the $5.00 filing fee, instead of submitting a
§ 1915 Motion and Affidavit.
Complaint, Petition or Application:
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
X
__
is not submitted
is not on proper form (must use the court’s current form)
is missing an original signature by the prisoner
is missing page nos.
uses et al. instead of listing all parties in caption
names in caption do not match names in text
addresses must be provided for all defendants/respondents in “Section A.
Parties” of complaint, petition or habeas application
other:
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Mr. Williams cure the deficiencies designated above within
thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Mr. Williams files in
response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Martinez, with the assistance of his case
2
manager or the facility’s legal assistant, shall obtain the Court-approved forms for filing
an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and
Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in a
Habeas Corpus Action, along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov.
It is
FURTHER ORDERED that, if Mr. Martinez fails to cure the designated
deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, this action will be
dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice.
DATED: January 28, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?