Malibu Media, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 18.104.22.168
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 17 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond ; denying 18 Defendant's Motion for Leave to appear by phone, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/5/2014.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00255-WYD-MEH
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on June 5, 2014.
Defendants’ Motion to Appear by Phone [filed June 3, 2014; docket # 18] and Motion for
Extension of Time [filed June 3, 2014; docket # 17] are denied without prejudice for failure to
comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1(a), which states,
Before filing a motion, counsel for the moving party or an unrepresented party
shall confer or make reasonable good faith efforts to confer with any opposing
counsel or unrepresented party to resolve any disputed matter. The moving party
shall describe in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific
efforts to fulfill this duty.
The Court reminds the parties of their continuing obligations to comply fully with Fed. R. Civ. P.
37(a)(1) and D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1(a). See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D.
Colo. 2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not
satisfied by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?