Boxer F2, L.P. v. Flamingo West, Ltd. et al.

Filing 182

ORDER re: 174 Plaintiff's Objection to Defendants William Bronchick and Bronchick & Associates, P.C.'s Cross-Designation of Deposition Testimony for Use at Trial. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/16/15. (pabsec)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00317-PAB-MJW
BOXER F2, L.P., a Texas limited partnership,
Plaintiff,
v.
FLAMINGO WEST, LTD., d/b/a LEGALWIZ PUBLICATIONS,
BRONCHICK & ASSOCIATES,
WILLIAM BRONCHICK, and
BRONCHICK & ASSOCIATES, P.C.,
Defendants.

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO
DEFENDANTS WILLIAM BRONCHICK AND BRONCHICK & ASSOCIATES, P.C.’S
CROSS-DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY FOR USE AT TRIAL

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Objection to Defendants William
Bronchick and Bronchick & Associates, P.C.’s Cross-Designation of Deposition Testimony
for Use at Trial [Docket No. 174]. The Court has reviewed the objection and rules as
follows:
TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM BRONCHICK, AS THE DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE
OF FLAMINGO WEST, LTD.:

Item #

Testimony

Objection

Ruling

1.

41:1-6

F.R.E 802

Overruled

2.

72:22 – 73:18

F.R.E 802

Overruled

3.

75:12 – 76:10

F.R.E 802

Overruled

4.

79:16 – 80:18

F.R.E 802

Overruled

Item #

Testimony

Objection

Ruling

5.

82:25 – 83:4

F.R.E 802

Overruled

6.

102:6 – 103:3

F.R.E 802

Overruled

7.

146:7-12

F.R.E 802

Overruled

TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM BRONCHICK, AS THE DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE
OF BRONCHICK & ASSOCIATES, P.C.:
Item #

Testimony

Objection

Ruling

1.

19:1-14

F.R.E 802

Overruled

2.

25:5-19

F.R.E 802

Overruled

3.

30:1-2

F.R.E 802

Overruled

4.

44:24-25

F.R.E 802

Overruled

TESTIMONY OF ZACHARY SEGAL, AS THE DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE OF
THE PLAINTIFF:
Item #

Testimony

Objection

Ruling

1.

28:24 – 37:3

Objection to 37:1-3
incomplete question
and answer

2.

35:21 – 36:22

3.

37:19 – 43:16

4.

54:25 – 60:1

Objection - subsumed
Overruled
in previous
designation
Objection to 41:22-25
Overruled
and 42:1-3 - witness
interrupted
Objection to 55:5-25;
Overruled
56:125; 57:13; 59:19-25; and
60:1 - witness
interrupted continually;
badgering;
argumentative

2

Sustained as to 37:1-3

Item #

Testimony

Objection

Ruling

5.

74:5-21

Objection to 74:5-10
damages supplemented
under FRCP
26(a)(1)(A)(iii)

6.

84:5-11

7.

89:20 – 92:23

Objection - calls for legal Sustained
conclusion from lay
witness
Objection to 90:23-25;
Sustained
91:1- 3 - witness
interrupted

Overruled

DATED October 16, 2015.
BY THE COURT:

s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge

3