Boxer F2, L.P. v. Flamingo West, Ltd. et al.
Filing
182
ORDER re: 174 Plaintiff's Objection to Defendants William Bronchick and Bronchick & Associates, P.C.'s Cross-Designation of Deposition Testimony for Use at Trial. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/16/15. (pabsec)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00317-PAB-MJW
BOXER F2, L.P., a Texas limited partnership,
Plaintiff,
v.
FLAMINGO WEST, LTD., d/b/a LEGALWIZ PUBLICATIONS,
BRONCHICK & ASSOCIATES,
WILLIAM BRONCHICK, and
BRONCHICK & ASSOCIATES, P.C.,
Defendants.
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTION TO
DEFENDANTS WILLIAM BRONCHICK AND BRONCHICK & ASSOCIATES, P.C.’S
CROSS-DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY FOR USE AT TRIAL
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Objection to Defendants William
Bronchick and Bronchick & Associates, P.C.’s Cross-Designation of Deposition Testimony
for Use at Trial [Docket No. 174]. The Court has reviewed the objection and rules as
follows:
TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM BRONCHICK, AS THE DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE
OF FLAMINGO WEST, LTD.:
Item #
Testimony
Objection
Ruling
1.
41:1-6
F.R.E 802
Overruled
2.
72:22 – 73:18
F.R.E 802
Overruled
3.
75:12 – 76:10
F.R.E 802
Overruled
4.
79:16 – 80:18
F.R.E 802
Overruled
Item #
Testimony
Objection
Ruling
5.
82:25 – 83:4
F.R.E 802
Overruled
6.
102:6 – 103:3
F.R.E 802
Overruled
7.
146:7-12
F.R.E 802
Overruled
TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM BRONCHICK, AS THE DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE
OF BRONCHICK & ASSOCIATES, P.C.:
Item #
Testimony
Objection
Ruling
1.
19:1-14
F.R.E 802
Overruled
2.
25:5-19
F.R.E 802
Overruled
3.
30:1-2
F.R.E 802
Overruled
4.
44:24-25
F.R.E 802
Overruled
TESTIMONY OF ZACHARY SEGAL, AS THE DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE OF
THE PLAINTIFF:
Item #
Testimony
Objection
Ruling
1.
28:24 – 37:3
Objection to 37:1-3
incomplete question
and answer
2.
35:21 – 36:22
3.
37:19 – 43:16
4.
54:25 – 60:1
Objection - subsumed
Overruled
in previous
designation
Objection to 41:22-25
Overruled
and 42:1-3 - witness
interrupted
Objection to 55:5-25;
Overruled
56:125; 57:13; 59:19-25; and
60:1 - witness
interrupted continually;
badgering;
argumentative
2
Sustained as to 37:1-3
Item #
Testimony
Objection
Ruling
5.
74:5-21
Objection to 74:5-10
damages supplemented
under FRCP
26(a)(1)(A)(iii)
6.
84:5-11
7.
89:20 – 92:23
Objection - calls for legal Sustained
conclusion from lay
witness
Objection to 90:23-25;
Sustained
91:1- 3 - witness
interrupted
Overruled
DATED October 16, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?