O'Banion v. Studio J Corporation
Filing
24
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/28/14 re: Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. The Motion is GRANTED as specified, and the case schedule is modified. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00339-BNB
MICHAEL O’BANION,
Plaintiff,
v.
STUDIO J CORPORATION, a/k/a Jonas Bros. Taxidermy Studio t/n,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [Doc. # 21, filed
7/15/2014] (the “Motion”). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning and made rulings on the
record, which are incorporated here.
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion [Doc. # 21] is GRANTED as specified, and the case
schedule is modified to the following extent:
Discovery Cut-Off:
January 23, 2015
(All discovery must be completed by the discovery cut-off. All
written discovery must be served so that responses are due on or
before the discovery cut-off.)
Dispositive Motions Deadline:
February 6, 2015
Expert Disclosures:
(a)
The parties shall designate all experts and provide
opposing counsel with all information specified in
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before November 3,
2014
(b)
The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and
provide opposing counsel with all information
specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before
December 5, 2014
The final pretrial conference remains set for February 24, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., in
Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver,
Colorado. The proposed final pretrial order shall be prepared by the parties and submitted to the
court no later than February 17, 2015.
Dated August 28, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?