Harman v. Colvin

Filing 13

Joint Case Managment Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 7/7/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 8/6/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 8/21/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 05/28/14. (jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00349-AP
MARK A. HARMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:

Michael W. Seckar

For Defendant:

John F. Walsh, U.S. Attorney
J. Benedict Garcia, Assistant U.S. Attorney
M. Thayne Warner, Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.

Date Complaint Was Filed:

2/7/2014

B.

Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 3/13/2014

C.

Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed:

-1-

5/8/2014

4.

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD

The administrative record has been filed. The parties believe that the record is complete.
5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE

The parties do not anticipate filing any additional evidence.
6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES

The parties do not believe that this case raises any unusual claims.
7.

OTHER MATTERS

This case is not on remand from a judicial decision.
8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.

Monday July 7, 2014

B.

Defendant’s Response Brief Due:

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

C.
9.

Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:

Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due:

Thursday, August 21, 2014

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.

Plaintiff does not request oral argument.

B.
10.

Plaintiff's Statement:
Defendant's Statement:

Defendant does not request oral argument.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.

(x)

All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

B.

(

All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.

)

-2-

11.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY
OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL
ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 28th day of May, 2014.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:

John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict Garcia
Assistant U.S. Attorney
U.S. Attorney’s Office, District of Colorado

/s/Michael W. Seckar
Michael W. Seckar
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, CO 81003
[phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ M. Thayne Warner
By: M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80249-4003
[phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant

-3-