Guion v. Spurlock et al
Filing
9
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/10/2014. (slibi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00391-BNB
CURTIS GUION, # 129917,
Plaintiff,
v.
SPURLOCK, Correctional Officer, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
WITZ, Correctional Officer, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
GILBERT, Correctional Officer, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
CUTCHER, Sergeant, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
GROOMS, Correctional Officer, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
Z. MAHER, Correctional Officer, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
CASADY, Correctional Officer, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
WHITE, Correctional Officer, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
CHAVEZ, Correctional Officer, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
VIGIL, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
OLIVETTE, Lieutenant, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
TRUJILLO, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
T. TRUJILLO, Sgt., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
BARBERO, Captain, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
TRAVIS TRANI, Warden, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
BROWN, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
P. ARCHULETA, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
MONTOYA, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
MORRIS, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
FIELDS, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
TAVNER, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
YOUNGER, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
JAMES FALK, Warden, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
L. MAYFIELD, Major, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
A. CORTEZ, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
FINAGGAN, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
MISTY LOGAN, Captain, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
BENSKO, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
D. RAYMOND, Sgt., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
J. OLSEN, Case Manager, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
S. FOSTER, Associate Warden, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
SOLANO, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
J.R. ADAMS, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
FAIRBAUN, Cpt., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
WALLACE, Lt., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
SIMS, C.M., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
WIXTON, Sgt., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
MEYERS, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
KEVIN MILYARD, Deputy Director of Prisons, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
HALVERSON, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
LARRY REID, Deputy Director, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
PEEK, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
DANFORTH, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
PRINNS, Sergeant, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
BUTERO, Sgt., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
R. RICHARDSON, Cpt., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
L. LAMPELA, Mental Health, in his Official and Individual Capacities,
R. CORDOVA, Lt., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
MAHONEY, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
K. MILLER, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
PERSONS, Lt., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
SAULS, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
LITTLE, Lt., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
ANDRIELLO, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
BLAKE, C.O., in his Official and Individual Capacities,
Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
Plaintiff, Curtis Guion, is in the custody of the Colorado Department of
Corrections (DOC) at the Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP). He has filed, pro se, a
Prisoner Complaint alleging deprivations of his constitutional rights pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1343 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Mr. Guion has been granted leave to proceed
without prepayment of the filing fee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.
The Court must construe the Complaint liberally because Mr. Guion is not
represented by an attorney. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972); Hall v.
Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991). However, the Court should not act as
an advocate for pro se litigants. See Hall, 935 F.2d at 1110. The Court has reviewed
the complaint and has determined that it is deficient. For the reasons discussed below,
Mr. Guion will be ordered to file an amended complaint.
Mr. Guion alleges in the Complaint that beginning on January 3, 2012, while he
was incarcerated at the Sterling Correctional Facility (SCF), and continuing through his
transfer to Centennial Correctional Facility (CCF), to his current placement at the
Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP), the Defendant prison officials at the DOC facilities
have conspired to murder him, his family and friends, and have threatened his family
and friends so they will cease communications with the Plaintiff. Mr. Guion alleges that
the Defendants have spread rumors throughout the administrative segregation units at
each facility that Plaintiff is a “snitch” and have given inmates shanks for the purpose of
stabbing the Plaintiff. Mr. Guion asserts in support of his second claim that Defendant
Mahoney, together with Defendants Sgt. Solano and Brown, tampered with his outgoing
mail in January 2013, and that unidentified staff members at SCF, CCF, and CSP
tampered with his mail on numerous dates in 2013. Plaintiff maintains in support of his
third claim that Defendant Cordova has denied him adequate clothing and charged him
twice for the same pair of inmate-issued pants. Mr. Guin asserts in claim four that he
filed a grievance with Defendant Assistant Warden Foster complaining about feces on
the floor of his cell, but Defendant Foster failed to take any remedial action. For his fifth
claim, Plaintiff alleges that on August 21, 2013, Defendants Bensko, Raymond, Trujillo
and Barbero engaged in the excessive use of force against him, which resulted in
Plaintiff being hospitalized with two severely chipped front teeth and a split lip that
required eight stitches. Mr. Guion further states that on May 14, 2013, he was
“MK-9-OC sprayed” by Defendant Butero and suffered a shotgun wound to his elbow
from Defendant Bensko. Plaintiff requests monetary relief.
The Complaint is deficient because Mr. Guion fails to allege the personal
participation of each named Defendant in a violation of his constitutional rights.
Personal participation is an essential allegation in a civil rights action. See Bennett v.
Passic, 545 F.2d 1260, 1262-63 (10th Cir. 1976); Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159,
166 (1985). There must be an affirmative link between the alleged constitutional
violation and each defendant’s participation, control or direction, or failure to supervise.
See Butler v. City of Norman, 992 F.2d 1053, 1055 (10th Cir. 1993); see also Dodds v.
Richardson, 614 F.3d 1185, 1200-1201 (10th Cir. 2010) (“[D]efendant-supervisors may
be liable under § 1983 where an ‘affirmative’ link exists between the unconstitutional
acts by their subordinates and their ‘adoption of any plan or policy. . .–express or
otherwise–showing their authorization or approval of such ‘misconduct.’”) (quoting Rizzo
v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371 (1976)). A supervisor defendant may not be held liable
for the unconstitutional conduct of his subordinates on a theory of respondeat superior.
See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 676 (2009). This is because Ҥ 1983 does not
recognize a concept of strict supervisor liability; the defendant’s role must be more than
one of abstract authority over individuals who actually committed a constitutional
violation.” Fogarty v. Gallegos, 523 F.3d 1147, 1162 (10th Cir. 2008).
Mr. Guion fails to allege with specificity each Defendant’s personal involvement in
allegedly conspiring to murder him, his family and friends, and in threatening his family
and friends so they will cease communications with the Plaintiff. Mr. Guion’s vague
allegations that all of the Defendants have spread rumors throughout the administrative
segregation units at each facility that Plaintiff is a “snitch” and have given inmates
shanks for the purpose of stabbing the Plaintiff are not sufficient enough to implicate the
55 named Defendants in a deprivation of his constitutional rights.
Furthermore, Mr. Guion cannot maintain claims against prison officials or
administrators on the basis that they denied his grievances. The "denial of a grievance,
by itself without any connection to the violation of constitutional rights alleged by
plaintiff, does not establish personal participation under § 1983." Gallagher v. Shelton,
587 F.3d 1063, 1069 (10th Cir. 2009); see also Whitington v. Ortiz, No. 07-1425, 307 F.
App’x. 179, 193 (10th Cir. Jan. 13, 2009) (unpublished) (stating that "the denial of the
grievances alone is insufficient to establish personal participation in the alleged
constitutional violations.") (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); Davis v. Ark.
Valley Corr. Facility, No. 02-1486, 99 F. App’x. 838, 843 (10th Cir. May 20, 2004)
(unpublished) (sending "correspondence [to high-ranking prison official] outlining [a]
complaint . . . without more, does not sufficiently implicate the [supervisory official]
under § 1983"). Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff, Curtis Guion, file within thirty (30) days from the date
of this order, an amended complaint that complies with the directives in this order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Guion, shall obtain the court-approved Prisoner
Complaint form (with the assistance of his case manager or facility’s legal assistant),
along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff is reminded
that his Prisoner Complaint may not exceed 30 pages. See Information and Instructions
for Filing a Prisoner Complaint. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that, if Mr. Guion fails to file an amended complaint that
complies with this order to the Court’s satisfaction within the time allowed, the Court
may dismiss some of the claims and defendants without further notice for the reasons
discussed above. It is
DATED March 10, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?