Hilts v. Mental Health Partners et al

Filing 11

ORDER denying as moot 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; denying as moot 5 Motion for Order; denying as moot 8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; and granting 10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/9/14.(nmarb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-00397-BNB JAHEEM R. HILTS, Plaintiff, v. MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS, and SHARON PAULEY, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915 Plaintiff has filed pro se on the proper forms an amended complaint (ECF No. 7) and a signed Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 10). Plaintiff will be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 solely on the basis of inability to prepay fees or give security therefor. Accordingly it is ORDERED that the Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 3), the motion (ECF No. 5) requesting court forms, and the unsigned Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 8) are DENIED as moot. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the court review the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) to determine if the complaint is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. It is FURTHER ORDERED that process shall not issue at this time. DATED April 9, 2014, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?