Hilts v. Mental Health Partners et al
Filing
11
ORDER denying as moot 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; denying as moot 5 Motion for Order; denying as moot 8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; and granting 10 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 4/9/14.(nmarb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00397-BNB
JAHEEM R. HILTS,
Plaintiff,
v.
MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERS, and
SHARON PAULEY,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915
Plaintiff has filed pro se on the proper forms an amended complaint (ECF No. 7)
and a signed Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915
(ECF No. 10). Plaintiff will be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915 solely on the basis of inability to prepay fees or give security therefor.
Accordingly it is
ORDERED that the Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave to
Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 3), the motion (ECF No. 5) requesting
court forms, and the unsigned Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 8) are DENIED as moot. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the court review the amended complaint pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) to determine if the complaint is frivolous or malicious, fails to
state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a
defendant who is immune from such relief. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that process shall not issue at this time.
DATED April 9, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?