Rice's Lucky Clover Honey, LLC v. Hawley
Filing
31
Second ORDER Revising Certain Deadlines in the June 6, 2014 20 Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 4/8/2015. Dispositive Motions due by 5/6/2015. All other firm deadlines and provisions of the June 6, 2014 Scheduling Order are to remain in effect except as provided herein, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/15/2015. (evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00402-RPM
RICE'S LUCKY CLOVER HONEY, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMIE HAWLEY, an individual,
Defendant.
_________________________________________________________________________
SECOND ORDER REVISING CERTAIN DEADLINES IN THE JUNE 6, 2014 SCHEDULING
ORDER
_________________________________________________________________________
On February 12, 2015, Plaintiff moved for a 49-day extension of the February 18,
2015 discovery cutoff as well as an commensurate extension of the deadline to file
dispositive motions, the lone remaining deadline based off of the discovery cutoff. The
Court, finding good cause exists for such an extension hereby orders the following deadlines
are extended 49 days to the dates indicated below:
Discovery cut-off: April 8, 2015
Dispositive motion deadline: May 6, 2015;
All other firm deadlines and provisions of the June 6, 2014 Scheduling Order are to
remain in effect except as provided herein.
Estimated time frames regarding the anticipated completion of depositions contained
in the June 6, 2014 Scheduling Order will not be enforced as it appears that depositions of
all parties must still be completed. The Court determines that the deadline to submit written
discovery requests has passed. However Rice’s Honey’s responses to Mr. Hawley’s
Requests for Production are due on February 19, 2015.
DATED this 12th day of February, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
________________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?