Rice's Lucky Clover Honey, LLC v. Hawley

Filing 31

Second ORDER Revising Certain Deadlines in the June 6, 2014 20 Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 4/8/2015. Dispositive Motions due by 5/6/2015. All other firm deadlines and provisions of the June 6, 2014 Scheduling Order are to remain in effect except as provided herein, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 2/15/2015. (evana, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-00402-RPM RICE'S LUCKY CLOVER HONEY, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, v. JAMIE HAWLEY, an individual, Defendant. _________________________________________________________________________ SECOND ORDER REVISING CERTAIN DEADLINES IN THE JUNE 6, 2014 SCHEDULING ORDER _________________________________________________________________________ On February 12, 2015, Plaintiff moved for a 49-day extension of the February 18, 2015 discovery cutoff as well as an commensurate extension of the deadline to file dispositive motions, the lone remaining deadline based off of the discovery cutoff. The Court, finding good cause exists for such an extension hereby orders the following deadlines are extended 49 days to the dates indicated below: Discovery cut-off: April 8, 2015 Dispositive motion deadline: May 6, 2015; All other firm deadlines and provisions of the June 6, 2014 Scheduling Order are to remain in effect except as provided herein. Estimated time frames regarding the anticipated completion of depositions contained in the June 6, 2014 Scheduling Order will not be enforced as it appears that depositions of all parties must still be completed. The Court determines that the deadline to submit written discovery requests has passed. However Rice’s Honey’s responses to Mr. Hawley’s Requests for Production are due on February 19, 2015. DATED this 12th day of February, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?