Zheng v. Nexion Health, Inc. et al
ORDER denying 17 Motion for Consolidation of Actions. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/25/2014.(klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00409-REB-MEH
NEXION HEALTH, INC., a Delaware corporation, and
NEXION HEALTH AT CHERRY CREEK, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a CHERRY
CREEK NURSING CENTER,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF ACTIONS
The matter before me is plaintiff’s Motion for Consolidation of Actions [#17]1
filed March 24, 2014. I deny the motion.
Under the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the
District of Colorado - Civil, “[a] motion to consolidate shall be decided by the district
judge to whom the oldest numbered case involved in the proposed consolidation is
assigned for trial” and, if consolidation is found to be warranted, the consolidated case
is assigned to the docket in the lowest numbered case. D.C.COLO.LCivR 42.1. In this
matter, that case putatively is Ekhator et al. v. Nexion Health, Inc. et al., Civil Action
No. 13-cv-3329-REB-KMT. Although I am the district judge assigned to both cases,
“[#17]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s case management system and electronic case filing (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
resolution of the motion for consolidation must be docketed and decided in the oldest
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Motion for Consolidation of Actions [#17]
filed March 24, 2014, is DENIED.
Dated March 25, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?