Cary v. Hickenlooper et al

Filing 10

MINUTE ORDER denying 9 Clarification of Error Regarding Minute Order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 7/30/2014.(slibi, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00411-BNB
ARNOLD A. CARY,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, State of Colorado,
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, CDOC,
JAMES FALK, Warden, SCT,
MAURICE FAUVEL, D.O., SCT, Physician,
KERI MCKAY, P.A., SCF, Physician Assistant,
KELSEY PRUSHA, R.N., SCF, Registered Nurse,
KEVIN VORWALD, Captain, SCF,
LT. PAGE, Lieutenant, SCF,
LT. MOON, Lieutenant, SCF,
LT. LUECK, Case Manager, SCF, and
LT. HERREA, Case Manager, SCF,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND
Plaintiff’s motion for “Clarification of Error Regarding Minute Order” filed on July
29, 2014 (ECF No. 9), is DENIED. Plaintiff seeks clarification of a minute order entered
on September 16, 2013, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix in Cary v. Tessier, No. 12cv-02074-RM-KLM (D. Colo. filed Aug. 6, 2012). See ECF No. 49 in No. 12-cv-02074RM-KLM. Therefore, he must ask for clarification in No. 12-cv-02074-RM-KLM and not
in the instant action.
On June 26, 2014, the Court entered an order (ECF No. 6) in the instant action
directing Plaintiff to file an amended Prisoner Complaint. On July 28, 2014, the Court
entered a minute order (ECF No. 8) that granted him a fourteen-day extension of time in
which to file the amended Prisoner Complaint. If through the July 29 motion for
clarification Plaintiff is attempting to inform the Court that he does not intend to pursue
the instant action and file that amended Prisoner Complaint as directed within the time
allowed, he should notify the Court of that fact in a clear and concise manner.
Dated: July 30, 2014