Cary v. Hickenlooper et al
Filing
3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 2/14/2014. (slibi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00411-BNB
(The above civil action number must appear on all future papers
sent to the court in this action. Failure to include this number
may result in a delay in the consideration of your claims.)
ARNOLD A. CARY,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, State of Colorado,
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, CDOC,
JAMES FALK, Warden, SCT,
MAURICE FAUVEL, D.O., SCT, Physician,
KERI MCKAY, P.A., SCF, Physician Assistant,
KELSEY PRUSHA, R.N., SCF, Registered Nurse,
KEVIN VORWALD, Captain, SCF,
LT. PAGE, Lieutenant, SCF,
LT. MOON, Lieutenant, SCF,
LT. LUECK, Case Manager, SCF, and
LT. HERREA, Case Manager, SCF,
Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES
Plaintiff, Arnold A. Cary, is a prisoner in the custody of the Colorado Department
of Corrections who currently is incarcerated at the correctional facility in Sterling,
Colorado. He submitted pro se a Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. 1). As part of the
court’s review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b), the court has determined that the
document is deficient as described in this order. Plaintiff will be directed to cure the
following if he wishes to pursue his claims. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to
this order must include the civil action number noted above in the caption of this order.
28 U.S.C. § 1915 Motion and Affidavit:
(1)
X
is not submitted (must use and complete the court’s current form revised
(2)
(3)
X
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
X
10/01/12 with Authorization and Certificate of Prison Official)
is missing affidavit
is missing certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement for the 6-month
period immediately preceding this filing
is missing certificate showing current balance in prison account
is missing required financial information
is missing an original signature by the prisoner
is not on proper form
names in caption do not match names in caption of complaint, petition or
habeas application
An original and a copy have not been received by the court.
Only an original has been received.
other: § 1915 motion and affidavit and certified account statement only
are necessary if $400.00 filing fee is not paid in full in advance.
Complaint, Petition or Application:
is not submitted
(11)
(12)
is not on proper form (must use the court’s current form)
is missing an original signature by the prisoner
(13)
(14)
is missing page nos.
(15)
uses et al. instead of listing all parties in caption
(16)
An original and a copy have not been received by the court. Only an
original has been received.
Sufficient copies to serve each defendant/respondent have not been
(17)
received by the court.
(18)
names in caption do not match names in text
(19)
X
other: Fails to provide a copy of (or a citation to the docket number for)
the order in No. 12-cv-02072-RM-KLM in which he was ordered to file a
separate action.
Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty
(30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this
order must include the civil action number on this order. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall obtain (with the assistance of his case
manager or the facility’s legal assistant) the Court-approved form for filing a Prisoner’s
Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, along with the
applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov, and shall use that form in curing the
designated deficiencies. It is
2
FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies
within thirty days from the date of this order, the Prisoner Complaint and the action
will be dismissed without further notice.
DATED February 14, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
s/Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?