Cary v. Hickenlooper et al

Filing 59

ORDER Resetting cheduling Conference for 4/21/2015 01:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. ORDERED that a copy of this Order is to be sent to the following: CASE MANAGER for Arnold A. Cary #136835 Sterling Correctional Facility (SCF) P.O. Box 6000 Sterling, CO 80751 by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 04/03/15. (jhawk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00411-PAB-NYW ARNOLD A. CARY, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, State of Colorado, RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, CDOC, JAMES FALK, Warden, SCF, MAURICE FAUVEL, D.O., Physician, SCF, KERI MCKAY, P.A., SCF, Physician Assistant, KELSEY PRUSHA, also known as Kelsey Dillinger, R.N., Registered Nurse, SCF, KEVIN VORWALD, Captain, SCF, PAGE, Lieutenant, SCF, MOON, Lieutenant, SCF, LUECK, Case Manager, SCF, and HERREA, Case Manager, SCF, Defendants. ORDER RE-SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IT IS ORDERED that the previously scheduled April 6, 2015 scheduling conference is hereby VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference is re-set for April 21, 2015 at 1:00 p.m., in Courtroom C-205, 2d Floor, Byron G. Rogers United State Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2(b). Plaintiff and his case manager shall contact the court at (303) 335-2600 on the above date and at the designated time in order to participate. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this Order is to be sent to the following: CASE MANAGER for Arnold A. Cary #136835 Sterling Correctional Facility (SCF) P.O. Box 6000 Sterling, CO 80751 DATED: April 3, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/Nina Y. Wang__________ United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?