Cary v. Hickenlooper et al

Filing 80

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 8/21/15. Plaintiff Arnold Cary's Motion for Independent Medical Examination 78 is DENIED, with leave to refile for further consideration should this case survive the pending Motion to Dismiss. (bsimm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00411-PAB-NYW ARNOLD A. CARY, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, State of Colorado, RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director, CDOC, JAMES FALK, Warden, SCF, MAURICE FAUVEL, D.O., Physician, SCF, KERI MCKAY, P.A., SCF, Physician Assistant, KELSEY PRUSHA, also known as Kelsey Dillinger, R.N., Registered Nurse, SCF, KEVIN VORWALD, Captain, SCF, PAGE, Lieutenant, SCF, MOON, Lieutenant, SCF, LUECK, Case Manager, SCF, and HERREA, Case Manager, SCF, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang This civil action comes before the court on Plaintiff Arnold Cary’s Motion for Independent Medical Examination [#78] filed on August 19, 2015, and that was referred to this Magistrate Judge pursuant to the Order Referring Case dated February 13, 2014 [#2] and the Memorandum dated August 19, 2015 [#79]. Currently pending before the Honorable Philip A. Brimmer is the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Recommendation”) that this action be dismissed, in its entirety, without prejudice. [#75]. Plaintiff has filed an Objection to that Recommendation [#77]. Plaintiff’s request for an independent medical examination may be obviated depending upon Judge Brimmer’s disposition of the Recommendation. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Plaintiff Arnold Cary’s Motion for Independent Medical Examination [#78] is DENIED, with leave to refile for further consideration should this case survive the pending Motion to Dismiss. DATED: August 21, 2015

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?