Smith v. Oliver

Filing 10

MINUTE ORDER denying 7 Motion for Order to Seal; re 9 Motion for Equitable Tolling, which the Court construes liberally as a motion for extension of time to compy with the 2/25/2014 Amended Order Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/31/2014.(slibi, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00452-BNB
HORATIO DEMARIOUS SMITH,
Applicant,
v.
JOHN C. OLIVER,
Respondent.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND
Applicant has filed a “Motion for Equitable Tolling” (ECF No. 9), which the Court
construes liberally as a motion for extension of time to comply with the February 25,
2014 Amended Order Directing Applicant to Cure Deficiencies. Although Applicant filed
his Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the courtapproved form, he has not yet filed a Prisoner’s Motion and Affidavit for Leave to
Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action. Accordingly,
Applicant shall have until thirty (30) days from the date of this minute order to cure
the remaining deficiencies, as identified in the February 25 Order. Applicant may pay
the $5.00 filing fee in lieu of filing a § 1915 Motion and Affidavit.
The Motion for Order . . . to Seal . . . (Doc. No. 7) is DENIED for failure to
comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2.
Dated: March 31, 2014