McSweeney v. Janes et al

Filing 93

ORDER granting 92 Motion to Dismiss Parties, St. Anthony Summit Medical Center and Jennifer Theisen (RRT) terminated. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/3/2015.(mlace, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 14-cv-00456-REB-MEH CONNOR McSWEENEY, Plaintiff, v. PETER JANES, M.D., KATHRYN REANEY, PA-C, JENNIFER THEISEN, RRT, ST. ANTHONY SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER, and VAIL-SUMMIT ORTHOPAEDICS, P.C., Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING PARTIES Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendants St. Anthony Summit Medical Center and Jennifer Theisen, RRT [#92]1 filed August 3, 2015. After careful review of the stipulated motion and the file, I conclude that the motion should be granted and that the claims of the plaintiff against defendants, St. Anthony Summit Medical Center, and Jennifer Theisen, RRT, should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendants St. Anthony Summit Medical Center and Jennifer Theisen, RRT is granted; 1 “[#92]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 2. That claims of the plaintiff against defendants, St. Anthony Summit Medical Center, and Jennifer Theisen, RRT, are dismissed with prejudice, with the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs; and 3. That defendants, St. Anthony Summit Medical Center, and Jennifer Theisen, RRT, are dropped as parties to this action, and the caption shall be amended accordingly. Dated August 3, 2015, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?