McSweeney v. Janes et al

Filing 95

ORDER granting 94 Motion to Dismiss Peter Janes, M.D., Kathryn Reaney, PA-C, and Vail-Summit Orthopaedics, P.C. with Prejudice. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 8/6/2015.(mlace, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00456-REB-MEH
CONNOR McSWEENEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
PETER JANES, M.D.,
KATHRYN REANEY, PA-C, and
VAIL-SUMMIT ORTHOPAEDICS, P.C.,
Defendants.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Peter Janes,
M.D., Kathryn Reaney, PA-C, and Vail-Summit Orthopaedics, P.C. with Prejudice
[#94]1 filed August 4, 2015. After careful review of the stipulated motion and the file, I
conclude that the motion should be granted and that the claims of the plaintiff against
defendants, Peter Janes, M.D., Kathryn Reaney, PA-C, and Vail-Summit Orthopaedics,
P.C., should be dismissed with prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Stipulated Motion To Dismiss Peter Janes, M.D., Kathryn
Reaney, PA-C, and Vail-Summit Orthopaedics, P.C. with Prejudice is granted;
2. That the claims of the plaintiff against defendants, Peter Janes, M.D., Kathryn

1

“[#94]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.

Reaney, PA-C, and Vail-Summit Orthopaedics, P.C., are dismissed with prejudice, with
the parties to pay their own attorney fees and costs; and
3. That this case is closed.
Dated August 6, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2