Eldridge v. Berkebile

Filing 11

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 03/05/14 DENYING 10 Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 . Applicant will be allowed twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to file a final amended Ap plication for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on the Court-approved form that incorporates all his desired changes and any information he wants to incorporate from the Motion to Proceed With Habeas Corpus for Credit for Time S erve[d] filed February 24, 2014 (ECF No. 5), which the Court DENIES by the minute order. To the extent the order entered on February 25, 2014 (ECF No. 7) directed Respondent to file a preliminary response within twenty-one days, the order is VACATED at this time. That portion of the February 25 order granting Applicant leave to proceed in forma pauperis is not vacated.(nmarb, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00478-BNB
CLINTON T. ELDRIDGE,
Applicant,
v.
D. BERKEBILE, Warden,
Respondent.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND
This matter is before the Court on the letter filed on March 3, 2014 (ECF No. 10),
in which Applicant moves to amend, correct, and modify the Application for Writ of
Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 he filed on February 24, 2014 (ECF No.
1). The motion is DENIED.
Applicant will be allowed twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order to
file a final amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
2241 on the Court-approved form that incorporates all his desired changes and any
information he wants to incorporate from the “Motion to Proceed With Habeas Corpus
for Credit for Time Serve[d]” filed February 24, 2014 (ECF No. 5), which the Court
DENIES by the minute order. Applicant should not file any document separate from the
final amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 he
is being directed to file. Failure to comply with the directives of this minute order may
result in the dismissal of the instant action.
To the extent the order entered on February 25, 2014 (ECF No. 7) directed
Respondent to file a preliminary response within twenty-one days, the order is
VACATED at this time. That portion of the February 25 order granting Applicant leave
to proceed in forma pauperis is not vacated.
Dated: March 5, 2014