Gehring v. Sallie Mae, Inc.
Filing
13
ORDER granting 12 the Unopposed Motion to Administratively Close Action Pending Arbitration Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2. In furtherance of the administrative closure, the parties are ordered to submit joint status reports to the Court every six months starting January 1, 2015. by Judge Wiley Y. Daniel on 5/21/2014.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Case No. 1:14-cv-00490-WYD-KMT
ALISHA GEHRING,
Plaintiff,
v.
SALLIE MAE, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER OF ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Unopposed Motion to Administratively
Close Action Pending Arbitration Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 (ECF No. 12), filed
May 19, 2014. In the pending motion, the parties request that I administratively close
this case, pending arbitration on Plaintiff's claims under the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act (TCPA), found at 47 U.S.C. ยง 227.
After carefully reviewing the file in this matter, I find that since the length of the
arbitration process described in the motion is uncertain, this case should be
administratively closed pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 with leave to be reopened for
good cause shown. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that the Unopposed Motion to Administratively Close Action Pending
Arbitration Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2 (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED. In
furtherance of the administrative closure, the parties are ordered to submit joint status
reports to the Court every six months starting January 1, 2015. Based upon those
status reports, the Court will determine the appropriate course of action. If either party
fails to file a status report by the ordered deadlines, the case shall be automatically
reopened and subject to dismissal for lack of prosecution.
Dated: May 21, 2014
BY THE COURT:
s/ Wiley Y. Daniel
Wiley Y. Daniel
Senior United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?