Martinez et al v. City of Aurora, The, et al.

Filing 38

MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 1/26/15. Amended Motion to Amend Complaint [#36] is GRANTED. (lgale, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00619-PAB-KLM
FRANCO MARTINEZ,
DANA MARTINEZ, and
PAUL GOMEZ, JR.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE CITY OF AURORA,
OFFICER TIMOTHY HUFFMAN,
OFFICER CHRISTOPHER CRUSER,
OFFICER BRAD GRAHAM, and
SERGEANT RANDAL MOODY,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion to Amend
Complaint [#36]1 (the “Motion”). The Motion attaches “as an exhibit a copy of the
amended pleading which strikes through . . . the text to be deleted and underlines . . . the
text to be added” in compliance with D.C.COLO.LCivR 15.1(a). However, Plaintiffs failed
to file the proposed Amended Complaint as a separate document on the docket.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#36] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file the Amended Complaint as a
separate document on the docket on or before January 30, 2015. Upon filing, the
Amended Complaint will become the operative pleading in this case without further order
of the Court.

1

“[#36]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.

1

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to the Amended
Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).
Dated: January 26, 2015

2