Smith v. Colton et al
Filing
45
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 7/7/15. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with an order of the court. (bsimm, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00620-NYW
MATTHEW J. SMITH,
Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIAM COLTON,
Defendant.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
By Order dated January 6, 2015, the court denied Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of
Time of 60 days to respond to Defendant’s First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for
Production of Documents. [#31].
Plaintiff never responded to Defendant’s written discovery
requests, and Defendant filed a Motion to Compel on February 19, 2015. [#37]. This court
ordered Plaintiff to respond to the Motion to Compel on or before March 12, 2015. [#38].
Plaintiff did not file a Response. This court granted the Motion to Compel in part and denied it
in part in an Order dated March 13, 2015. [#40]. A copy of that Order was returned to the court
as undeliverable on April 10, 2015. [#43].
Pursuant to Local Rule of Practice 41.1, D.C.COLO.LCivR, I ordered Plaintiff to show
cause in writing and on or before April 13, 2015 why this case should not be dismissed pursuant
to D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.1 for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with an Order of the
court. [#42, issued March 26, 2015]. Plaintiff has failed to respond or otherwise demonstrate an
interest in pursuing this action. On March 25, 2014, the Parties consented to the jurisdiction of a
magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and the Pilot Program to Implement the Direct
Assignment of Civil Cases to Full Time Magistrate Judges. [#10]. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE
for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with an order of the court.
DATED: July 7, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/Nina Y. Wang__________
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?