Everhart v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Filing
82
MINUTE ORDER The Joint 80 Motion is GRANTED. The Motion Hearing set for February 27, 2015 at 1:30 p.m. is vacated, to be reset at a later date if deemed necessary; The 77 Motion to Amend is GRANTED. This court requested a Word version of the Proposed Amended Protective Order (Protective Order) from the Parties in an email dated February 19, 2015, to which they did not respond. The Parties shall submit a Word version of the Protective Order to Wang_chambers@cod.uscourts.gov on or before March 4, 2015, by Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 2/26/2015.(evana, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00694-WYD-NYW
RICHARD EVERHART,
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang
This civil action comes before the court on Plaintiff Richard Everhart and Defendant
American Family Mutual Insurance Company’s (the “Parties”) Joint Motion to Vacate Hearing
(“Joint Motion”). [#80, filed February 25, 2015]. Also before the court is the Parties’ Motion to
Amend/Correct/Modify Joint Motion for Protective Order (“Motion to Amend”). [#77, filed
February 16, 2015]. Pursuant to the Order Referring Case dated March 7, 2014 [#4] and the
memoranda dated February 26, 2015 [#81] and February 16, 2015 [#78], respectively, these
matters were referred to this Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The Joint Motion is GRANTED. The Motion Hearing set for February 27, 2015 at 1:30
p.m. is vacated, to be reset at a later date if deemed necessary;
(2) The Motion to Amend is GRANTED. This court requested a Word version of the
Proposed Amended Protective Order (“Protective Order”) from the Parties in an email
dated February 19, 2015, to which they did not respond. The Parties shall submit a Word
version of the Protective Order to Wang_chambers@cod.uscourts.gov on or before
March 4, 2015.
DATED: February 26, 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?