Wirth v. SSA - Commissioner

Filing 19

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 7/29/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 8/29/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/15/2014 by Judge John L. Kane on 06/18/14. (jhawk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge John L. Kane Civil Action No. 14-cv-00703-AP JOSHUA D. L. WIRTH, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Chris R. Noel 4845 Pearl East Circle, Ste 101 Boulder, Colorado 80301-6113 303-449-6503 chrisildar@comcast.net For Defendant: John F. Walsh United States Attorney J. Benedict Garcia Assistant United States Attorney District of Colorado S/Thayne Warner Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169 Denver, Colorado 80294 (303) 844-7237 Thayne.warner@ssa.gov 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. B. C. 4. Date Complaint was filed: Date Complaint was served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: Date Answer and Administrative Record were filed: March 7, 2014 March 21, 2014 May 15, 2014 STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD Plaintiff states that the administrative record is presumed to be complete. Defendant, to the best of his knowledge, states that the administrative record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Plaintiff states that additional evidence may be required because the ALJ did not develop the evidence of Plaintiff’s learning disorder. Records from CSU Psychological Services are being sought today. Defendant does not intend to submit additional evidence. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASES RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES Plaintiff states there are no unusual claims or defenses. Defendant, to the best of his knowledge, does not believe the cases raises unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. This case is not on appeal from any other remanding court. 2 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE The parties respectfully request the following briefing schedule: A. B. C. 9. July 29, 2014 August 29, 2014 September 15, 2014 STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. 10. Plaintiff’s opening brief due Defendant’s response brief due Plaintiff’s reply brief due Plaintiff does not request oral argument. Defendant does not request oral argument. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C. COLO.L.CivR. 6.1(E) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 18th day of June, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 3 APPROVED: s/Chris R. Noel______ Chris R. Noel Law Office of Chris R Noel 4845 Pearl East Circle, Suite 101 Boulder, Colorado 80301-6113 303-449-6503 chrisildar@comcast.net JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney J. Benedict Garcia Assistant United States Attorney District of Colorado s/M. Thayne Warner M. Thayne Warner Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169 Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 844-7237 Thayne.warner@ssa.gov 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?