Buhendwa v. Regional Transportation District

Filing 5

ORDER granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; denying as premature 4 Motion for and Order Compelling Production of Ducument [sic] Rule 34, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/12/2014.(slibi, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-00720-BNB MADINA BUHENDWA, Plaintiff, v. REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, University Based Pass/CU Student Buss Pass, BENJAMIN NORMAN, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915 Plaintiff has filed pro se a Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 3) and a Complaint. The motion and affidavit indicate that Plaintiff should be granted leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 solely on the basis of inability to prepay fees or give security therefor. Accordingly it is ORDERED that the Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (ECF No. 3) is granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the court review the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) to determine if the complaint is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the “Motion for and Order Compelling Production of Ducument [sic] Rule 34" (ECF No. 4) is DENIED as premature. It is FURTHER ORDERED that process shall not issue at this time. DATED March 12, 2014, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?