Galindo v. CCRC, Inc. et al.
Filing
36
STIPULATED ORDER granting 10 Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed as a Collective Action, for Court-authorized Notice and for Disclosure of the Names, Addresses and Dates of Employment of the Potential Opt-In Plaintiffs, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/10/2014. (eseam)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.: 14-cv-00725-KMT
LUIS GALINDO on his own behalf and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
CCRC, INC. d/b/a AGAVE MEXICO BISTRO
AND TEQUILA HOUSE, M. DEL R.C., INC. and
RENE CERVANTES, JR.
Defendants.
STIPULATED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO PROCEED AS A
COLLECTIVE ACTION [DOC. NO. 10]
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed as a Collective Action
[Doc. No. 10]. Having considered Defendants’ Response to the Motion to Proceed as a
Collective Action [Doc. No. 12], Plaintiff’s Reply on the Motion to Proceed as a Collective
Action [Doc. No. 17], and the parties’ stipulations as described in Plaintiff’s Reply [Doc. No.
17], and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, this Court grants the motion and enters
appropriate orders. Therefore, it is
ORDERED as follows:
1. Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed as a Collective Action, for Court-authorized Notice and for
Disclosure of the Names, Addresses and Dates of Employment of the Potential Opt-In Plaintiffs
[Doc. No. 10] is GRANTED;
2. This case is conditionally certified to proceed as a “collective action” under 29 U.S.C. §
216(b) and that the class is defined as: “Current and former employees of CCRC, Inc., d/b/a
Agave Mexico Bistro and Tequila House, M. Del R.C., Inc., d/b/a, La Mariposa-Lyons, and
L.M.R.C., Inc., d/b/a La Mariposa-Longmont who worked on or after March 11, 2011”;
3. The Notice of Lawsuit [Doc. No. 17-1] is approved;
4. A sixty (60) day “opt-in period,” during which potential class members may choose to
opt-in to this suit by returning a signed Consent Form to Plaintiff’s counsel, is approved;
5. Plaintiff shall deliver the approved Notice in English and Spanish, along with a postage
paid return envelope addressed to Plaintiff’s counsel, to all potential class members via first-class
U.S. Mail;
6. Plaintiff shall retain and make available for inspection all consent to join forms received,
along with all postmarked envelopes, email, or fax-stamped receipts relating thereto;
7. Defendants shall include a copy of the approved Notice in English and Spanish in two
consecutive pay envelopes of all putative class members currently employed by Defendants;
8. Defendants shall post the approved Notice in English and Spanish in conspicuous places
at their places of business, except for the Lyons La Mariposa location;
9. Defendants shall produce, within fourteen (14) days of date of this Order, a computerreadable data file in an agreed format, containing the names, addresses, telephone numbers and
dates of employment of the potential class members;
10. Defendants and Plaintiff shall cooperate in translation of the Notice, and that Defendants
shall conduct the initial translation and secure Plaintiff’s agreement as to the translation within
twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order.
11. fourteen (14) days after Defendants produce the requested document containing
information pertaining to potential class members and Plaintiff agrees to the translation of the
Notice, the “opt-in period” shall commence, Plaintiff shall mail the approved Notice, Defendants
shall post the approved Notice pursuant to number 8 above, and Defendants shall begin including
the approved Notice in all currently-employed putative class members’ pay envelopes as per
number 7 above.
Dated this 10th day of July, 2014.
Approved by:
____/s/___________
Brandt Milstein
595 Canyon Blvd.
Boulder, CO 80302
303.440.8780
brandt@milsteinlawoffice.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
____/s/____________
Frank Suyat
455 Sherman Street, Suite 300
Denver, CO 80203
303.777.3737
fsuyat@dillanddill.com
Attorney for Defendants
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?