Collins v. Trans Union, LLC et al
Filing
33
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/25/14 re: 30 MOTION to File Documents Under Seal, filed by Michael A. Collins. The plaintiffs filing of the DVD does not comply with the Electronic Case Filing Procedures, and the contents of the DVD will not be considered. (nmarb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00742-BNB
MICHAEL A. COLLINS,
Plaintiff,
v.
TRANS UNION, LLC,
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.,
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, and
LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA RETRIEVAL SERVICES LLC, individually,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
The plaintiff previously filed a Motion to File Documents Under Seal [Doc. # 30, filed
8/18/2014], which I denied by an Order [Doc. # 31]. The Order mistakenly reported that the
plaintiff sought an order restricting access to “‘the exhibits to the Verified Complaint and
Amended Verified Complaint,’ but no exhibits are attached to those documents, nor have any
been filed separately.” In fact, the plaintiff did submit the exhibits conventionally on a DVD.
Filing materials in the District of Colorado is governed by the Electronic Case Filing
Procedures (Civil Cases). Section 1.2(f) of those procedures provides that non-prisoner pro se
parties not approved to file electronically “must file their documents in paper” and that the paper
documents “will be scanned and uploaded into ECF by court staff.” Consequently, the plaintiff’s
filing of the DVD does not comply with the Electronic Case Filing Procedures, and the contents
of the DVD will not be considered.
SO ORDERED.
Dated August 25, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?