Collins v. Trans Union, LLC et al

Filing 33

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/25/14 re: 30 MOTION to File Documents Under Seal, filed by Michael A. Collins. The plaintiffs filing of the DVD does not comply with the Electronic Case Filing Procedures, and the contents of the DVD will not be considered. (nmarb, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 14-cv-00742-BNB MICHAEL A. COLLINS, Plaintiff, v. TRANS UNION, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, and LEXISNEXIS RISK DATA RETRIEVAL SERVICES LLC, individually, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ The plaintiff previously filed a Motion to File Documents Under Seal [Doc. # 30, filed 8/18/2014], which I denied by an Order [Doc. # 31]. The Order mistakenly reported that the plaintiff sought an order restricting access to “‘the exhibits to the Verified Complaint and Amended Verified Complaint,’ but no exhibits are attached to those documents, nor have any been filed separately.” In fact, the plaintiff did submit the exhibits conventionally on a DVD. Filing materials in the District of Colorado is governed by the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil Cases). Section 1.2(f) of those procedures provides that non-prisoner pro se parties not approved to file electronically “must file their documents in paper” and that the paper documents “will be scanned and uploaded into ECF by court staff.” Consequently, the plaintiff’s filing of the DVD does not comply with the Electronic Case Filing Procedures, and the contents of the DVD will not be considered. SO ORDERED. Dated August 25, 2014. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?