Navarrete v. Trani, et al
Filing
7
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 03/27/14 re: 5 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 filed by Ernesto Navarrete, and 6 Tendered Document filed by Ernesto Navarrete, requesting Court appointed cou nsel. The Applicant has failed to submit a certified account statement showing the current balance in his inmate account, as he is required to do pursuant to the instructions stated at the bottom of Page Two of the § 1915 form. Applicant shall h ave thirty days from the date of this Minute Order to provide to the Court a certified account statement showing the current balance in his inmate account. Furthermore, the Court denies Plaintiffs request for appointment of counsel, ECF No. 6, as premature. (nmarb, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00756-BNB
ERNESTO NAVARRETE,
Applicant,
v.
TRAVIS TRANI, OR FERNANDO FREYER, and
THE ATTORNEY OF THE STATE OF COLORADO,
Respondents.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND
Pursuant to the March 15, 2014 Order to Cure Deficiencies, Applicant submitted
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 claims and request to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 on
proper Court-approved forms. He, however, failed to submit a certified account
statement showing the current balance in his inmate account, as he is required to do
pursuant to the instructions stated at the bottom of Page Two of the § 1915 form.
Applicant shall have thirty days from the date of this Minute Order to provide to the
Court a certified account statement showing the current balance in his inmate account.
If Applicant fails to comply within the time allowed the Court will dismiss this action
without further notice.
Furthermore, the Court denies Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel, ECF
No. 6, as premature.
Dated: March 27, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?