United States Welding Inc v. Tecsys Inc

Filing 93

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 86 Plaintif's Motion to Extend Discovery and to Compel Answer by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/13/2015. Initial expert disclosures due by 5/4/2015. Rebuttal expert disclosure deadline 6/3/2015. Discovery due by 7/3/2015. Dispositive Motions due by 8/3/2015.(mdave,)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-00778-REB-MEH UNITES STATES WELDING, INC., a Colorado corporation, Plaintiff, v. TECSYS, INC., a Canadian corporation, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 13, 2015. Plaintiff’s Motion to Extend Discovery and to Compel Answer [filed April 10, 2015; docket #86] is granted in part and denied in part. First, Plaintiff’s motion to compel the Defendant to file an Answer is denied as moot; Defendant filed an Answer on Monday, April 13, 2015 (docket #89).1 Second, the Court finds Plaintiff does not demonstrate good cause for a 90-day extension of the discovery deadlines, but will allow a brief extension for Plaintiff’s review and consideration of the Answer; accordingly, the Court will modify the Scheduling Order as follows: Initial expert disclosures deadline: Rebuttal expert disclosure deadline: Discovery deadline: Dispositive motion deadline: May 4, 2015 June 3, 2015 July 3, 2015 August 3, 2015 All other deadlines, conference dates and trial dates remain the same. Plaintiff’s counsel shall serve a copy of Plaintiff’s motion and this order on the Plaintiff pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 6.1(c). 1 Defendant was not required under the federal or local rules to file the Answer prior to the District Court’s ruling on this Court’s recommendation concerning Defendant’s motion to dismiss. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?