United States Welding Inc v. Tecsys Inc

Filing 95

ORDER granting 87 Motion for Sealing Response to Defendant's Motion for Sanctions. Plaintiff United States Welding Inc's Response to Tecsys' Motion for Imposition of Sanctions [# 83 ] shall be maintained under Level 1 restriction as defined by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2(b). By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/21/2015. (alowe)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00778-REB-MEH
UNITED STATES WELDING INC., a Colorado corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
TECSYS, INC., a Canadian corporation,
Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on Plaintiff United States Welding, Inc.’s Motion for
Sealing Response to Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions [#87]1 filed April 10, 2015.
The requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2 have been satisfied. A showing of
compelling reasons has been made. No objections have been filed. Thus, Plaintiff
United States Welding, Inc.’s Response to Tecsys’ Motion for Imposition of
Sanctions [#83] filed April 9, 2015, is entitled to Level 1 restriction as defined by
D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2(b) (“Level 1 limits access to the parties and the court”).
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Plaintiff United States Welding, Inc.’s Motion for Sealing Response
to Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions is granted; and
2. That Plaintiff United States Welding, Inc.’s Response to Tecsys’ Motion

1

“[#87]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.

for Imposition of Sanctions [#83] shall be maintained under Level 1 restriction as
defined by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2(b).
Dated April 21, 2015, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:

2