Daviss et al v. School District Number 1, in the City and County of Denver

Filing 41

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 6/10/15. (sgrim)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-0795-CMA-KMT ____________________________________________________________________________ TRELLANY DAVISS and SHARRON KEY, Plaintiffs, v. SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 1, in the CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER a/k/a DENVER PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant. STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION Upon a showing of good cause in support of the entry of a protective order to protect the discovery and dissemination of confidential information or information which will improperly annoy, embarrass, or oppress any party, witness, or person providing discovery in this case, IT IS ORDERED: 1. This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, materials, and information, including without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests for admission, deposition testimony, and other information disclosed pursuant to the disclosure or discovery duties created by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2. As used in this Protective Order, "document" is defined as provided in Fed.R.Civ.P. 34(a). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this term. 3. Information designated “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be information that is confidential and implicates common law and statutory privacy interests of current or former Denver Public 1 Schools (“DPS”) employees and may include without limitation, personnel records and personal information related to the Plaintiffs (e.g., financial and medical records). See, e.g., section 24– 72–204(3)(a)(II)(A), C.R.S. (concerning disclosure of personnel records); and sections 19–1– 304(1)(a) and (b.5), C.R.S. (concerning disclosure of juvenile delinquency records and arrest and criminal records information). Neither party shall designate as confidential documents which are public record, nor is either party permitted to designate as confidential documents which do not implicate the interests sought to be protected herein. Wholesale designation of all documents as confidential is not permitted. CONFIDENTIAL information shall not be disclosed or used for any purpose except the preparation and trial of this case. 4. CONFIDENTIAL documents, materials and/or information (collectively “CONFIDENTIAL information”) shall not, without the consent of the party producing it or further Order of the Court, be disclosed except that such information may be disclosed to: (a) attorneys actively working on this case; (b) persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys actively working on the case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in the preparation for trial, at trial, or at other proceedings in this case; (c) the parties, including the Plaintiffs and designated representatives for the entity defendant; (d) expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this proceeding, to the extent such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial or other proceedings in this case; (e) the Court and its employees ("Court Personnel"); 2 (f) stenographic reporters who are engaged in proceedings necessarily incident to the conduct of this action; (g) (h) other persons by written agreement of the parties; and (i) 5. deponents, witnesses, or potential witnesses; the jury (juries) in this case. Prior to disclosing any CONFIDENTIAL information to any person listed above (other than counsel, persons employed by counsel, Court Personnel and stenographic reporters), counsel shall provide such person with a copy of this Protective Order and obtain from such person a written acknowledgment (Exhibit A) stating that he or she has read this Protective Order and agrees to be bound by its provisions. All such acknowledgments shall be retained by counsel and shall be subject to in camera review by the Court if good cause for review is demonstrated by opposing counsel. 6. CONFIDENTIAL documents, materials, and/or information will not be copied or retained by any person other than the parties’ counsel, subject to ¶ 11 below. If any CONFIDENTIAL materials are provided to the persons listed in ¶ 4(c), (d), (g) or (h) above, at the close of litigation such persons will either return the Confidential information to counsel who provided it or will provide written notification that the confidential material has been destroyed. 7. Documents are designated as CONFIDENTIAL by placing or affixing on them (in a manner that will not interfere with their legibility) or otherwise designating as CONFIDENTIAL in clear and conspicuous manner the following or other appropriate notice: "CONFIDENTIAL." 8. Whenever a deposition involves the disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL information, the deposition or portions thereof shall be designated as CONFIDENTIAL and shall be subject to the 3 provisions of this Protective Order. Such designation shall be made on the record during the deposition whenever possible, but a party may designate portions of depositions as CONFIDENTIAL after transcription, provided written notice of the designation is promptly given to all counsel of record within thirty (30) days after notice by the court reporter of the completion of the transcript. 9. A party may object to the designation of particular CONFIDENTIAL information by giving written notice to the party designating the disputed information. The written notice shall identify the information to which the objection is made. If the parties cannot resolve the objection within ten (10) business days after the time the notice is received, it shall be the obligation of the party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL to file an appropriate motion requesting that the Court determine whether the disputed information should be treated as CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Protective Order. If such a motion is timely filed, the disputed information shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion. If the designating party fails to file such a motion within the prescribed time, the disputed information shall lose its designation as CONFIDENTIAL and shall not thereafter be treated as CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with this Protective Order unless otherwise deemed CONFIDENTIAL as a matter of law. In connection with a motion filed under this provision, the party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the disputed information to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL. 10. Any and All Confidential Information produced by any party in this litigation shall, upon the conclusion of the litigation, including any appeals, be either returned to the party producing 4 such information, or destroyed by respective counsel in accordance with their document retention policies. 11. If CONFIDENTIAL materials are filed with the Court, the parties shall seek leave to file such materials under seal pursuant to Local Rule 7.2, or with appropriate redactions made. 12. This Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any time for good cause shown following notice to all parties and an opportunity for them to be heard. DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of June, 2015. ___________________________________ KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE STIPULATED TO AND APPROVED AS TO FORM this 8th day of June, 2015. s/ Todd J. McNamara Todd J. McNamara Mathew S. Shechter McNamara, Roseman & Kazmierski, LLP 1640 East Eighteenth Avenue Denver, Colorado 80218 303-333-8700 – Telephone 303-331-6967 – Facsimile tjm@18thavelaw.com mss@18thavelaw.com ____/s/ Mary B. Gray______ M. Brent Case Holly Ortiz Mary B. Gray Semple, Farrington & Everall, P.C. 1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 1308 Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 595-0941 Fax: (303) 861-9608 hortiz@semplelaw.com bcase@semplelaw.com skim@semplelaw.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June 8, 2015, I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing via CM/ECF, E-mail, U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, or other proper and lawful service addressed as follows: M. Brent Case Holly Ortiz Mary Gray Semple, Farrington & Everall, P.C. 1120 Lincoln Street, Suite 1308 Denver, CO 80203 Telephone: (303) 595-0941 Fax: (303) 861-9608 hortiz@semplelaw.com bcase@semplelaw.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT ____/s Mathew S. Shechter__________________________ 6 EXHIBIT A AFFIDAVIT STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF ) )ss ) _____________________________, swears or affirms and states under penalty of perjury: 1. I have read the Protective Order in Daviss & Key v. School District No. 1 in the County of Denver and State of Colorado, et al,. Civil Action No. 2014-cv-795-CMA-KMT, a copy of which is attached to this Affidavit. 2. I have been informed by __________________, Esq., counsel for _____________________, that the materials described in the list attached to this Affidavit are Confidential Information as defined in the Protective Order. 3. I promise that I have not and will not divulge or undertake to divulge to any person or recording device any Confidential Information shown or told to me except as authorized in the Protective Order. I will not use the Confidential Information for any purpose other than this litigation. 4. For the purpose of enforcing the terms of the Protective Order, I hereby submit myself to the jurisdiction of the court in the civil action referenced above. 5. I will abide by the terms of the Protective Order. _________________________________________ (Signature) _________________________________________ (Print or Type Name) Address: _________________________________________ _________________________________________ SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ______________ day of ___________________________, 2015, by_______________________________. WITNESS my hand and official seal. _____________________________ Notary Public My commission expires:________________ 7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?