Ruiz et al v. Act Fast Delivery of Colorado, Inc. et al

Filing 113

ORDER SETTING Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference for 1/14/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties or their counsel shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/30/15. (nywlc1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-0870-MSK-NYW DOMINGO RUIZ and MICHAEL BRYANT, Plaintiffs, v. ACT FAST DELIVERY OF COLORADO, INC. and POWERFORCE OF COLORADO, INC., Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ______________________________________________________________________________ IT IS ORDERED that a supplemental Scheduling Conference is set for January 14, 2016 at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom C-204, 2d Floor, Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2(b). A copy of the instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form of scheduling order can be downloaded from the court’s website at www.cod.uscourts.gov. The parties or their counsel shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures V.6.0, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference. DATED: December 30, 2015 BY THE COURT: s/Nina Y. Wang__________ United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?