Ruiz et al v. Act Fast Delivery of Colorado, Inc. et al
Filing
113
ORDER SETTING Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference for 1/14/2016 11:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang. The parties or their counsel shall submit their proposed scheduling order, including a copy of the proposed scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or before seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference By Magistrate Judge Nina Y. Wang on 12/30/15. (nywlc1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-0870-MSK-NYW
DOMINGO RUIZ and
MICHAEL BRYANT,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ACT FAST DELIVERY OF COLORADO, INC. and
POWERFORCE OF COLORADO, INC.,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
______________________________________________________________________________
IT IS ORDERED that a supplemental Scheduling Conference is set for January 14, 2016
at 11:00 a.m., in Courtroom C-204, 2d Floor, Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929
Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. Please remember that anyone seeking entry into the Byron G.
Rogers United States Courthouse will be required to show valid photo identification. See
D.C.COLO.LCivR 83.2(b).
A copy of the instructions for the preparation of a scheduling order and a form of
scheduling order can be downloaded from the court’s website at www.cod.uscourts.gov. The
parties or their counsel shall submit their proposed scheduling order, pursuant to District of
Colorado Electronic Case Filing (“ECF”) Procedures V.6.0, including a copy of the proposed
scheduling order in a Word format sent via email to Wang_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov, on or
before seven days prior to the Scheduling Conference.
DATED: December 30, 2015
BY THE COURT:
s/Nina Y. Wang__________
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?