CDMO, Inc. et al v. Comfort Dental Group, Inc.

Filing 106

COURTROOM MINUTES for Status Conference held before Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/14/2015. Denying 99 Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendant's First, Second, Third and Fourth Claim for Relief. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 105 . FTR: K. Terasaki. (ebuch)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Date: Courtroom Deputy: FTR Technician: August 14, 2015 Emily Buchanan Kathy Terasaki Civil Action No. 14-cv-00871-RPM Counsel: CDMO, INC., and CDET, INC., Neil Arney Plaintiffs, v. COMFORT DENTAL GROUP, INC., Defendant. Steven Kelso Kathryn Reilly Erin Frohardt COURTROOM MINUTES STATUS CONFERENCE 1:52 p.m. Court in session. Discussion regarding Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs’ Answer to the Counterclaim, and the subfranchisees’ participation in this lawsuit. ORDERED: Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff’s First, Second, Third and Fourth Claim for Relief (Doc. No. 99) is DENIED. ORDERED: Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Comfort Dental Group, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants’ First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 105). Defendant will file a motion to dismiss its counterclaims without prejudice if the Court grants Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. 2:03 p.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 11 minutes.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?