CDMO, Inc. et al v. Comfort Dental Group, Inc.
Filing
106
COURTROOM MINUTES for Status Conference held before Judge Richard P. Matsch on 8/14/2015. Denying 99 Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Defendant's First, Second, Third and Fourth Claim for Relief. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 105 . FTR: K. Terasaki. (ebuch)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch
Date:
Courtroom Deputy:
FTR Technician:
August 14, 2015
Emily Buchanan
Kathy Terasaki
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00871-RPM
Counsel:
CDMO, INC., and
CDET, INC.,
Neil Arney
Plaintiffs,
v.
COMFORT DENTAL GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
Steven Kelso
Kathryn Reilly
Erin Frohardt
COURTROOM MINUTES
STATUS CONFERENCE
1:52 p.m.
Court in session.
Discussion regarding Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs’
Answer to the Counterclaim, and the subfranchisees’ participation in this lawsuit.
ORDERED: Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff’s First, Second, Third and Fourth Claim for
Relief (Doc. No. 99) is DENIED.
ORDERED: Plaintiff shall respond to Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Comfort Dental
Group, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants’ First
Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 105).
Defendant will file a motion to dismiss its counterclaims without prejudice if the Court grants
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint.
2:03 p.m.
Court in recess.
Hearing concluded. Total time: 11 minutes.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?