Ramirez et al v. EZ Drop Polypiper Company et al

Filing 45

MINUTE ORDER granting 41 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Granting 42 Plantiffs' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiffs shall file responses to the pending motions to dismiss on or before 6/2/2014. Denying as moot 43 and 44 Motions for Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/21/2014. (eseam)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00881-MEH
JUANITA RAMIREZ, by her conservator and next friend, J.R., a minor, and
MARIA BARRAZA, by her guardian and next friend,
Plaintiffs,
PINNOCOL ASSURANCE,
Plaintiff-Intervenor,
v.
EZ DROP POLYPIPER COMPANY, an Arkansas corporation,
BAUGHER FARMS, INC., an Arkansas corporation,
STEVE BAUGHER, L.L.C., an Arkansas limited liability company,
STEVE BAUGHER, individually,
HOOD & COMPANY, INC., a Missouri corporation, and
STEVE HOOD, individually,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on May 21, 2014.
Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time for Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Intervenor
to Respond to the EZ Drop Polypiper Defendants’ [sic] Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal
Jurisdiction [filed May 20, 2014; docket # 41] and Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for an Extension
of Time for Plaintiffs and Plaintiff Intervenor to Respond to the Hood Defendants’ Motions to
Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction [filed May 20, 2014; docket # 42] are granted. The
Plaintiffs shall file responses to the pending motions to dismiss on or before June 2, 2014.
In addition, the “motions for order” filed by the Plaintiffs [dockets ## 43, 44] are simply
proposed orders for the above-referenced motions and, thus, are denied as moot.