Prograde Ammo Group LLC v. Perry et al

Filing 50

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 48 Motion for Protective Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 07/25/14.(jhawk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 14-cv-00884-PAB-MEH PROGRADE AMMO GROUP LLC, a Delaware limited liability company d/b/a BVAC, Plaintiff, v. CURT PERRY, an individual, KRISTEN PERRY, an individual, AMMO KAN, a Colorado limited liability company, AMMO CAN LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, AMMO CAN LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, AMMO KAN FRANCHISE GROUP LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, HIGH COUNTRY SALES, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, HIGH COUNTRY WHOLESALE, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, HIGH COUNTRY SPORT, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, MAVERICK AMMUNITION LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, TAD VETTE, an individual, VICTOR VETTE, an individual, and JOHN DOES 1-5, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on July 25, 2014. Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of a Stipulated Protective Order [filed July 24, 2014; docket # 48] is denied without prejudice, and the proposed Stipulated Protective Order is refused. The parties are granted leave to submit a revised proposed protective order consistent with Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), in which the Court requires a specific mechanism by which the parties may challenge the designation of information as confidential. See id. at 388-89. Also, the Court will reject any request to retain continuing jurisdiction over an action that has been closed. If the Plaintiff chooses to re-file its motion, it shall provide to this Court a copy of the proposed protective order in useable format (Word, Word Perfect).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?