Rhodes v. Olson Associates, P.C.
Filing
49
ORDER granting 48 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Relief From Final Judgment, by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 9/11/2015.(vbarn)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00919-CMA-MJW
KELLIE RHODES, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
OLSON ASSOCIATES, P.C., d/b/a OLSON SHANER,
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM
FINAL JUDGMENT
Pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff’s
Unopposed Motion for Relief from Final Judgment requests an additional award of
attorney fees in the amount of $8,435.00. (Doc. # 48.)
In the Final Order and Judgment, issued the same date as the Final Approval
Hearing in the instant matter (August 28, 2015), the Court declined to award attorney
fees for additional time class counsel Michael Greenwald estimated it would take to
bring this case to its completion (30 hours), on the grounds that were no time records
before the Court to substantiate Mr. Greenwald’s estimated figure and such records are
required. 1 Accordingly, in support of the instant Motion, Mr. Greenwald has submitted
detailed and contemporaneous time records indicating that he spent an additional 24.1
1
Because Plaintiff’s final approval papers were due on August 18, 2015, they necessarily did
not include any attorney time spent on this case after that date.
hours working on this matter, from August 19, 2015 through August 28, 2015. The
Court has reviewed these records and being satisfied that these hours were reasonable
and necessary to obtaining final approval of the settlement, 2 and within the terms of the
Settlement Agreement (which provided for a total recovery of $75,000 in attorney fees
and expenses), it finds that good cause exists to modify the final judgment. As such,
Plaintiff’s Motion (Doc. # 48) is hereby GRANTED. 3 It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the Final Order and Judgment (Doc. # 47) is
amended as follows:
PAGE THREE: “10) The reasonable attorney fees and expenses in this matter,
to be awarded pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692k, are $70,675.28 (representing
$69,375.14 in attorney fees and $1300.14 in reimbursable expenses).”
PAGE FOUR: “2) Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees
and Reimbursement of Expenses (Doc. # 45) is GRANTED IN PART, and
Plaintiff’s counsel is awarded a total of $70,675.28 (representing $69,375.14 in
attorney fees and $1300.14 in reimbursable expenses).”
2
The Court notes that, in the exercise of billing discretion, class counsel has indicated that it
does not seek reimbursement for any time spent on this case by the other partners of Mr.
Greenwald’s firm between August 19, 2015 and August 28, 2015, nor does class counsel seek
reimbursement for the time preparing the instant Motion and the declaration attached thereto.
3
In its findings at the Final Fairness Hearing on August 28, 2015, the Court determined that a
reasonable billing rate for Mr. Greenwald in this matter is $350/hour. Accordingly, this rate is
applied to the additional attorney time, resulting in a total fee of $8,435.00 (24.1 hours multiplied
by $350 an hour).
DATED: September 11, 2015
BY THE COURT:
_______________________________
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?