Clayton v. Samsonite Employees Retirement Income Plan, The et al

Filing 71

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya: Motions Hearing held on 5/4/2015. ORDERED:The discovery deadline is extended to May 15, 2015; and June 15, 2015 for responses. ORDERED: July 31, 2015 is the close of disc overy. ORDERED: The briefing schedule for supplementing the Administrative Record is: Opening briefs are due October 30, 2015; and responses are due November 30, 2015; replies are due by December 30, 2015. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion to Con duct Discovery 52 is GRANTED. ORDERED: The Parties' Stipulation and Unopposed Motion to Continue Scheduling Order Deadlines Pending Ruling on Motion to Conduct Discovery and to Submit Proposed Scheduling Order Deadlines Following Ruling on Motion to Conduct Discovery 58 is GRANTED.Hearing concluded.FTR: Courtroom C201. (dhans, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No:
Courtroom Deputy:

14-cv-00932-RM-KMT
Deborah Hansen

Date: May 4, 2015
FTR: Courtroom C-201

Parties:

Counsel:

D. MICHAEL CLAYTON,

Jennifer L. Kroll
Susan J. Martin

Plaintiffs,
v.
THE SAMSONITE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
INCOME PLAN, f/k/a THE SAMSONITE
RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN;
SAMSONITE LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS PLAN
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SAMSONITE
EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN; and
PLAN ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SAMSONITE
CORPORATION SUPPLEMENTAL
EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN,

Dirk W. deRoos
Thomas W. Carroll

Defendant.

COURTROOM MINUTES

MOTIONS HEARING
01:32 p.m.

Court in session.

Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Court raises Plaintiff’s Motion to Conduct Discovery [Docket No. 52] for oral argument.
Discussion/Argument
ORDERED: The discovery deadline is extended to May 15, 2015; and June 15, 2015 for
responses.

ORDERED: July 31, 2015 is the close of discovery.
ORDERED: The briefing schedule for supplementing the Administrative Record is:
Opening briefs are due October 30, 2015; and responses are due November
30, 2015; replies are due by December 30, 2015
ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Motion to Conduct Discovery [Docket No. 52] is GRANTED.
ORDERED: Parties’ Stipulation and Unopposed Motion to Continue Scheduling Order
Deadlines Pending Ruling on Motion to Conduct Discovery and to Submit
Proposed Scheduling Order Deadlines Following Ruling on Motion to
Conduct Discovery [Docket No. 58] is GRANTED.
03:32 p.m.

Court in recess.

Hearing concluded.
Total in-court time

2 hours

*To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at [phone].

2