Ali et al v. Jerusalem Restaurant, Inc.
Filing
93
MINUTE ORDER granting 87 Unopposed Motion in Limine Regarding Evidence of Defendant's Law Firm; granting 89 Unopposed Motion in Limine Regarding Evidence Related to Claims on Which Summary Judgment was Granted; granting 91 Unopposed Motion in Limine Regarding Evidence Related to Race, Religion, or National Origin Discrimination; granting 92 Unopposed Motion in Limine Regarding Immigration or Citizenship Status of any Witness or Employee of Defendant, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/02/2015. The remaining three motions in limine filed on 4/01/2015, will be heard at the Trial Preparation Conference on 4/10/2015.(slibi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00933-MEH
HANAN ALI, and
LENA DERANI,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JERUSALEM RESTAURANT, INC.,
Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 2, 2015.
Defendant’s Unopposed Motion In Limine Regarding Immigration or Citizenship Status of
any Witness or Employee of Defendant [filed April 1, 2015; docket #92] is granted. The Court
instructs Plaintiffs at the trial in this matter not to refer to, interrogate witnesses concerning, attempt
to offer into evidence, or to convey to the jury in any manner, either directly or indirectly, evidence
regarding any evidence as to the immigration or citizenship status of any witness.
Defendant’s Unopposed Motion In Limine Regarding Evidence Related to Race, Religion,
or National Origin Discrimination [filed April 1, 2015; docket #91] is granted. The Court instructs
Plaintiffs at the trial in this matter not to refer to, interrogate concerning, attempt to offer into
evidence, or convey to the jury in any manner, either directly or indirectly, any evidence or inference
of race, religion, or national origin discrimination.
Defendant’s Unopposed Motion In Limine Regarding Evidence Related to Claims on Which
Summary Judgment was Granted [filed April 1, 2015; docket #89] is granted. The Court instructs
Plaintiffs at the trial in this matter not to refer to, interrogate concerning, attempt to offer into
evidence, or convey to the jury in any manner, either directly or indirectly, any evidence related to
Plaintiff Derani’s breach of contract claim.
Defendant’s Unopposed Motion In Limine Regarding Evidence of Defendant’s Law Firm
[filed April 1, 2015; docket #87] is granted. The Court instructs Plaintiffs at the trial in this matter
not to refer to, interrogate concerning, attempt to offer into evidence, or convey to the jury in any
manner, either directly or indirectly, any evidence or inference as to the size of or resources
available to Jerusalem’s counsel’s law firm or law offices.
The remaining three motions in limine filed on April 1, 2015, will be heard at the Trial
Preparation Conference on April 10, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?