Heim v. Colvin
Filing
16
ORDER: Joint case management plan for social security cases. SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 7/28/2014. SS Defendants Brief due by 8/27/2014. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 9/12/2014. By Judge John L. Kane on 6/23/2014. (trlee, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00968-AP
Lyle C. Heim,
Plaintiff,
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Teresa H. Abbott
3515 S. Tamarac Drive, Suite 200
Denver CO 80237
303-757-5000
303-689-9627 (facsimile)
abbott.teresa@gmail.com
For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
J. Benedict García
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
J.B.Garcia@usdoj.gov
M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, Colorado 80294-4003
303-844-7273
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
thayne.warner@ssa.gov
-1-
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 4/9/14
C.
4.
Date Complaint Was Filed: 4/4/14
Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 6/9/14
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of her knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.
5.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
The parties state that there are no other matters. This case is not on remand from a judicial
decision.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A.
Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: 7/28/14
B.
Defendant’s Response Brief Due: 8/27/14
C.
Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 9/12/14
-2-
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
Plaintiff's Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B.
Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A.
( X) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
B.
( ) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
11. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A
COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S
CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon
a showing of good cause.
DATED this 23rd day of June, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
/s/ Teresa H. Abbott
Teresa H. Abbott
3515 S. Tamarac Drive, Suite 200
Denver, CO 80237
303-757-5000
303-689-9627 (facsimile)
Abbott.teresa@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
By: /s/ M. Thayne Warner
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1961 Stout Street, Suite 4169
Denver, CO 80294-4003
303-844-7273
303-844-0770 (facsimile)
Thayne.Warner@ssa.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?