DJS One, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
MINUTE ORDER. Motion for Stipulated Protective Order 22 is DENIED without prejudice, and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/7/14.(sgrim)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 14–cv–00980–REB–KMT
DJS ONE, INC., a Colorado corporation,
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for COMMUNITY BANKS
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
This matter is before me on the “Joint Motion for Stipulated Protective Order” (Doc. No. 22 ,
filed Aug. 7, 2014.) The Motion is DENIED and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED.
The parties are granted leave to submit a motion for protective order and revised form of
protective order consistent with the comments contained here.
Gillard v. Boulder Valley School District, 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), set out certain
requirements for the issuance of a blanket protective order such as the one sought here. Among
other things, any information designated by a party as confidential must first be reviewed by a
lawyer who will certify that the designation as confidential is “based on a good faith belief that
[the information] is confidential or otherwise entitled to protection.” Gillard, 196 F.R.D. at 386.
The proposed Protective Order does not comply with the requirements established in Gillard.
Therefore, it is ORDERED that the Motion for Stipulated Protective Order (Doc. No. 22) is
DENIED without prejudice, and the proposed Protective Order is REFUSED.
Dated: August 7, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?