DJS One, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Filing 27

MINUTE ORDER; The 25 Joint Motion for Stipulated Protective Order is DENIED without prejudice. The parties are granted leave to submit a motion for protective order and revised form of protective order consistent with the comments contained herein by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 8/18/14.(morti, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 14–cv–00980–REB–KMT
DJS ONE, INC., a Colorado corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for COMMUNITY BANKS
OF COLORADO,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
The “Joint Motion for Stipulated Protective Order” (Doc. No. 25, filed Aug. 11, 2014) is
DENIED without prejudice. The parties are granted leave to submit a motion for protective
order and revised form of protective order consistent with the comments contained herein.
The court cannot accept Paragraph 15 of the proposed Protective Order, which provides that
documents filed with the court that have been designated shall be “placed in sealed envelopes or
other appropriate containers on which shall be endorsed the caption of the case, the label
“CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” or similar wording . . . .” (Doc. No. 25-1 ¶ 15.) It is not
appropriate to file documents designated as “Confidential” conventionally. Instead, such
documents must be filed electronically and, if necessary, under restriction. See Dist. of Colo.
ECF Civ. Procedures § V.5.1. The parties are also advised that any documents filed with the
court under restriction must be accompanied or followed by a motion to restrict that fully
addresses the factors outlined in D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2. “A stipulated protective order with
regards to discovery, alone, [is] insufficient to justify restriction.” D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.2(c)(2).
Dated: August 18, 2014