Maresca v. Mink

Filing 12

ORDER granting 10 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Administratively Close Case. This case is administratively closed pending the resolution of Plaintiff's underlying state court appeal. Granting 11 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint. Parties shall not file a proposed scheduling order and the 7/17/2014 Scheduling Conference is vacated, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 6/9/2014. (eseam)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-00995-MEH
MARGUERITE MARESCA,
Plaintiff,
v.
TED MINK, Jefferson County, Colorado Sheriff, in his official capacity,
Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE

Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Administratively Close Case Until
Conclusion of State Court Appeal [filed June 5, 2014; docket #10], and Defendant’s Unopposed
Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint [filed June 6, 2014; docket #11]. The Court
having review the Motion and being fully advised thereof hereby ORDERS as follows:
1.

The Motion to Administratively Close Case is GRANTED for good cause shown;

2.

The above-captioned action shall be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED pending the
resolution of Plaintiff’s underlying state court appeal;

3.

If Plaintiff wishes to reopen the action, Plaintiff must move to reopen within thirty
(30) days from the date of the Colorado Supreme Court’s ruling;

4.

The Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint is GRANTED;

5.

Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint fourteen (14)
days after the action is administratively -reopened;

6.

The Parties shall not file a proposed Scheduling Order and the Scheduling
Conference currently set for July 17, 2014 is hereby VACATED.

Dated at Denver, Colorado, this 9th day of June, 2014,
BY THE COURT:

Michael E. Hegarty
United States Magistrate Judge

2