Sheppard v. Weatherford International, LLC

Filing 70

ORDER granting in part 69 Motion to Stay, denying without prejudice and granting leave to refile 61 Motion to Dismiss, as outlined in the attached order. Status Report due by 9/14/2015. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 06/04/2015. (athom, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Raymond P. Moore Civil Action No. 14–cv–01000–RM–CBS MITCH SHEPPARD, MELISSA S. LOFTON, MANUEL MENDOZA, WILLIAM P. DELAMERE, and VINCENT PEREZ, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL, LLC F/K/A WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL, INC., and PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings. (ECF No. 69.) The parties request that the Court “stay all proceedings and discovery” in this matter pending mediation. (ECF No. 69 at 1.) The Court has been fully advised of the premises of this request. (See ECF No. 69.) Based on the foregoing, the Court: (1) GRANTS, in part, the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings (ECF No. 69); (2) DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND GRANTS LEAVE TO REFILE Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 61); (3) STAYS all proceedings and discovery in this matter; (4) ORDERS the parties to file a joint-status report within five days following the parties’ intended mediation; and (5) ORDERS the parties, in the event that the parties fail to hold the intended mediation in August 2015 (see ECF No. 61 at 1), to file a joint-status report no later than September 14, 2015. DATED this 4th day of June, 2015. BY THE COURT: ____________________________________ RAYMOND P. MOORE United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?