Sheppard v. Weatherford International, LLC
Filing
70
ORDER granting in part 69 Motion to Stay, denying without prejudice and granting leave to refile 61 Motion to Dismiss, as outlined in the attached order. Status Report due by 9/14/2015. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 06/04/2015. (athom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 14–cv–01000–RM–CBS
MITCH SHEPPARD,
MELISSA S. LOFTON,
MANUEL MENDOZA,
WILLIAM P. DELAMERE, and
VINCENT PEREZ, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL, LLC F/K/A WEATHERFORD INTERNATIONAL,
INC., and
PRECISION ENERGY SERVICES, INC.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings. (ECF
No. 69.) The parties request that the Court “stay all proceedings and discovery” in this matter
pending mediation. (ECF No. 69 at 1.) The Court has been fully advised of the premises of this
request. (See ECF No. 69.)
Based on the foregoing, the Court:
(1)
GRANTS, in part, the parties’ Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings (ECF No. 69);
(2)
DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND GRANTS LEAVE TO REFILE
Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 61);
(3)
STAYS all proceedings and discovery in this matter;
(4)
ORDERS the parties to file a joint-status report within five days following the
parties’ intended mediation; and
(5)
ORDERS the parties, in the event that the parties fail to hold the intended
mediation in August 2015 (see ECF No. 61 at 1), to file a joint-status report no later than
September 14, 2015.
DATED this 4th day of June, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?