Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Chamberlain et al
Filing
25
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 7/23/14.Unopposed Motion to Vacate Scheduling Conference 23 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for July 29, 2014, at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERE D that on or before September 5, 2014, the parties shall file a stipulation dismissing this action or Plaintiff shall file a status report informing the Court that the parties have been unable to resolve this action and requesting that the Court reset the Scheduling Conference. (lgale)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01023-REB-KLM
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A.,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and
GEORGIA CHAMBERLAIN, Garfield County Public Trustee,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
______________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Vacate
Scheduling Conference [#23]1 (the “Motion”). In the Motion, Plaintiff states that it
requests that the Scheduling Conference be vacated “[i]n order to give the parties sufficient
time to conduct their due diligence regarding whether the matters in this case may be
resolved by stipulation and, if so, to give the parties time to draft and finalize such a
stipulation . . . .” Motion [#23] 2. Plaintiff proposes that “[i]n the event that a stipulation
dismissing this action is not filed by September 5, 2014 or the parties determine that they
cannot resolve the issue in this case by stipulation, the Plaintiff will submit a status report
and request the Court issue an order setting a new Scheduling Conference.” Id.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#23] is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference set for July 29, 2014,
at 10:30 a.m. is VACATED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on or before September 5, 2014, the parties shall
file a stipulation dismissing this action or Plaintiff shall file a status report informing the
1
“[#23]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to
a specific paper by the Court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I
use this convention throughout this Minute Order.
1
Court that the parties have been unable to resolve this action and requesting that the Court
reset the Scheduling Conference.
Dated: July 23, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?