Ybanez v. Scott, et al
Filing
64
MINUTE ORDER granting 58 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's November 6, 2014 Written Discovery Requests; granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion to Strike Ex Parte Pleading or for Service and Extension of Time to Respond, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 12/10/2014.(slibi, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 14-cv-01059-MSK-MJW
NATHAN YBANEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
BERNADETTE SCOTT, in her individual and official capacities as Lieutenant of the
SCF Mail Room, and
UNKNOWN SCF MAIL ROOM EMPLOYEE “C. Mathis,” in her individual capacity,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that:
•
Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s
November 6, 2014 Written Discovery Requests (Docket No. 58) is
GRANTED. Due to issues that may be raised by the briefing on
Defendants’ Motion to Stay, the Court grants an extension of time seven
days longer than requested. Defendant Scott shall have up to and
including January 15, 2015 to respond to Plaintiff’s November 6, 2014
written discovery requests;
•
Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Ex Parte Pleading or for Service and Extension
of Time to Respond (Docket No. 60) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED
IN PART. The motion is denied insofar as it seeks to strike Defendants’
Motion to Stay Discovery (Docket No. 56). It is granted insofar as it
seeks, in the alternative, an extension of time in which to respond to such
motion. Plaintiff shall have up to and including December 31, 2014 to file
a response to Defendants’ Motion to Stay Discovery (Docket No. 56); and
•
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff
Nathan Ybanez at Sterling Correctional Facility, P.O. Box 6000, Sterling,
CO 80751.
Date: December 10, 2014
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?